2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation and climate histories between MIS 63 and 53 in the Early Pleistocene in central Japan based on plant macrofossil evidences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rich fossil records in Europe probably suggest a diversity center of the subfamily there during the past. In East Asia, fossil records of Rosoideae are mainly from Japan (e.g., Ozaki, 1991;Matsushita et al, 1994;Yabe, 2008;Momohara et al, 2016Momohara et al, , 2017Ito et al, 2017;Yamakawa et al, 2017). They are only sporadically distributed in China (Huang et al, 2015;Su et al, 2016), despite the modern diversity in this region.…”
Section: Contribution To the Fossil Record Of Rosoideaementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rich fossil records in Europe probably suggest a diversity center of the subfamily there during the past. In East Asia, fossil records of Rosoideae are mainly from Japan (e.g., Ozaki, 1991;Matsushita et al, 1994;Yabe, 2008;Momohara et al, 2016Momohara et al, , 2017Ito et al, 2017;Yamakawa et al, 2017). They are only sporadically distributed in China (Huang et al, 2015;Su et al, 2016), despite the modern diversity in this region.…”
Section: Contribution To the Fossil Record Of Rosoideaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fossil representatives are mainly confined to three genera, including Potentilla L., Rosa , and Rubus . Rubus , for example, has been recorded from more than 100 localities, with ages ranging from the Pleistocene to the middle Eocene (e.g., Chandler, ; Dorofeev, ; Tiffney, ; Meyer & Manchester, ; Mai, ; Bhandari et al, , ; Momohara et al, ). The other two genera, Potentilla and Rosa , also have an excellent fossil record (e.g., Becker, ; Dorofeev, ; Mai & Walther, ; Meyer & Manchester, ; Fyles et al, ; Mai, ; Kellner et al, ; Su et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reconstructed palaeotemperatures, including the coldest‐month mean temperature (CMMT), warmest‐month mean temperature (WMMT) and mean annual temperature (MAT), for the fossil sites, based on climatic requirements of modern equivalents of the fossil components. To estimate the climatic requirements of taxa, we referred to local flora and vegetation survey reports, in which the distribution of taxa is described and/or mapped on an altitudinal scale of at least 100 m, based on herbarium specimens and/or field observations (Momohara, Ueki, & Saito, 2017). Temperatures limiting the vertical distribution of taxa were estimated based on data obtained from the Japan Meteorological Agency (2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the present study site is surrounded by high‐altitude mountains, and we accordingly assume that the macrofossil assemblages in the sandy sediments also include those plant remains transported from vegetation in higher altitudes. As an alternative approach, we approximated palaeotemperatures at the site of fossil deposition based on the warmest value among the coldest limiting temperatures of the individual components, which is obtained for the most thermophilous taxon (Momohara, 1994; Momohara et al, 2017). Although the coldest value among the warmest limit temperatures of the assemblage components has also been used in this regard, it is considered to represent palaeotemperatures at the lowermost distribution limit of the most cold‐loving taxon, where temperatures are often lower than those at the site of fossil deposition (Momohara et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beech dominance in fossil assemblages was reported from the Uonuma Group in south Niigata Prefecture and Kazusa Group in west Tokyo. From the lower Pleistocene Uonuma Group, F. crenata cupules occur commonly and abundantly (Niigata Fossil Plant Research Group [NFPRG] & Niigata Pollen Research Group [NPRG], 1983; Momohara et al, 2017). Although NFPRG and NPRG (1983) identified cupules from the lower part of the group to belong to F. microcarpa based on their size, F. microcarpa ‐type cupules have not been found (unpublished data of the authors).…”
Section: Evolution Of Modern Beech Forest Since the Late Pliocene To ...mentioning
confidence: 99%