2015
DOI: 10.1657/aaar0013-031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation and Permafrost Thaw Depth 10 Years after a Tundra Fire in 2002, Seward Peninsula, Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
48
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ground surface color and texture also have changed from the 2006 image, indicating a vegetation shift after the 2002 fire, as Narita et al . [] reported. The plausible cause for these drastic surface changes, seen only in areas burned between 2000 and 2006, is the 2002 wildfire.…”
Section: Interpretations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Ground surface color and texture also have changed from the 2006 image, indicating a vegetation shift after the 2002 fire, as Narita et al . [] reported. The plausible cause for these drastic surface changes, seen only in areas burned between 2000 and 2006, is the 2002 wildfire.…”
Section: Interpretations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[, ] and Narita et al . []. These studies showed that soil moisture had been higher for burned areas than for unburned ones in 2005, though this relationship has been reversed in the following years and surface soil layers at burned areas became drier.…”
Section: Interpretations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results support the view that burn severity is an important factor in vegetation recovery (Cai, Yang, Liu, Hu, & Weisberg, ), but suggest a caveat that there is an interaction between severity and topography that must be considered in areas where surface permafrost exists. The post‐fire recovery patterns are different between valley sites with permafrost and without permafrost (Narita et al., ; Schuur, Crummer, Vogel, & Mack, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%