Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118648551.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation as a tool in the interpretation of fluvial geomorphic processes and landforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 203 publications
0
8
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Sixty-eight stream and river sites were sampled to represent the landscape variability within the 185 000 km 2 Chesapeake Bay and Delaware River watersheds in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic (figure 1), formative watersheds in American history that now supply drinking water and economic activity to almost 40 million people (Kauffman and Collier 2018) and have a long history of watershed and stream disturbance (Costa 1975, Walter andMerrits 2008). Dendrogeomorphic measurements of long-term geomorphic change (Hupp et al 2016), geomorphometric surveying, and sediment characterization, were made of both streambank and floodplain throughout a representative 100 m sampling reach of each site. These measurements were used to calculate rates of vertical net change of active floodplain and of lateral net change of streambank and the resulting fluxes of mass of sediment and attached nutrients per meter of channel length per year in each site, representing mean rates over the decadal time scales of woody vegetation measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixty-eight stream and river sites were sampled to represent the landscape variability within the 185 000 km 2 Chesapeake Bay and Delaware River watersheds in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic (figure 1), formative watersheds in American history that now supply drinking water and economic activity to almost 40 million people (Kauffman and Collier 2018) and have a long history of watershed and stream disturbance (Costa 1975, Walter andMerrits 2008). Dendrogeomorphic measurements of long-term geomorphic change (Hupp et al 2016), geomorphometric surveying, and sediment characterization, were made of both streambank and floodplain throughout a representative 100 m sampling reach of each site. These measurements were used to calculate rates of vertical net change of active floodplain and of lateral net change of streambank and the resulting fluxes of mass of sediment and attached nutrients per meter of channel length per year in each site, representing mean rates over the decadal time scales of woody vegetation measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, the inner dates were used as the best estimate for dating and grouping of the data for analysis, and ages were defined as years before 2017. Following core collection, the cores were mounted, prepared, and cross-dated at Western Carolina University using skeleton plots according to procedures described by Stokes and Smiley [40]. Decadal-scale, bank erosion rates were determined by measuring the amount of erosion that had occurred around the roots of dendrochronologically dated trees growing along the upper edge of the channel banks (patterned after Hupp and Bornette, [40]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following core collection, the cores were mounted, prepared, and cross-dated at Western Carolina University using skeleton plots according to procedures described by Stokes and Smiley [40]. Decadal-scale, bank erosion rates were determined by measuring the amount of erosion that had occurred around the roots of dendrochronologically dated trees growing along the upper edge of the channel banks (patterned after Hupp and Bornette, [40]). More specifically, bank erosion rates were estimated for 17 trees by dividing the amount of erosion by the determined age of the tree, where the amount of erosion was defined as the distance from the channel bank to the most distant root exposed within the channel (Figure S3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Celle-ci est basée sur le principe que les cernes de croissance produits par les espèces ligneuses enregistrent une variabilité interannuelle de leur largeur et que cette variabilité est liée à la dynamique des paramètres environnementaux inluençant la croissance ligneuse (climat, apport en eau, ouverture ou fermeture du milieu…) (Béguin et al, 1991 ;Stoffel et al, 2012). Dans le cas des forêts riveraines, les facteurs environnementaux dominants sont, premièrement, le degré de connexion hydrologique avec le chenal et la nappe d'accompagnement et, secondairement, les processus sédimentaires qui ont cours dans le chenal et dans la plaine (Astrade et Bégin, 2003 ;Astrade et Dufour, 2010 ;Hupp et al, 2016). De fait, la végétation alluviale est un bon indicateur de la dynamique des cours d'eau.…”
Section: Matériel Et Méthodes Sites D'étudeunclassified
“…La dendrochronologie est classiquement utilisée ain de déterminer la chronologie, l'intensité et la répartition spatiale des changements passés (Braam et al, 1987). Cependant, la sensibilité de cet outil est variable dans le temps et dans l'espace (Hupp et al, 2016). Cette étude comprend donc une dimension méthodologique, puisqu'il s'agit de tester l'intérêt effectif d'une approche dendrochronologique pour étudier le fonctionnement des ripisylves des cours d'eau du Nord-Ouest de la France ce qui, à notre connaissance, n'a jamais été fait.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified