2014
DOI: 10.1656/045.021.0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation Communities of a Coal Reclamation Site in Southeastern Ohio

Abstract: A manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the distribution of woody cover was not uniform on PWMA. Furthermore, reclaimed mine lands can be dominated by large blocks of nonnative vegetation that persist for decades (Cavender et al ). Thus, management aimed at setting back succession (prescribed fire) is not needed as much as management aimed at improving the composition of vegetation (disking and herbicide applications) and advancing succession (increasing coverage and distribution of shrub cover).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the distribution of woody cover was not uniform on PWMA. Furthermore, reclaimed mine lands can be dominated by large blocks of nonnative vegetation that persist for decades (Cavender et al ). Thus, management aimed at setting back succession (prescribed fire) is not needed as much as management aimed at improving the composition of vegetation (disking and herbicide applications) and advancing succession (increasing coverage and distribution of shrub cover).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non‐native species are commonly planted during reclamation because they establish quickly and allow mining companies to fulfill their bond requirements. Extensive coverage of non‐native plants limits establishment of native herbaceous and woody vegetation by arresting succession and causing reclaimed mine lands to persist in these plant communities for decades (Brothers , Groninger et al , Cavender et al ). These reclamation practices may not provide high‐quality habitat for bobwhites because vegetation is dense at ground level, potentially impeding bobwhite movement and foraging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite these improvements, soil conditions on reclaimed mine sites remain low in fertility, high in compaction, prone to drought conditions, and subject to invasive herbaceous species (Steiger, 1996;Bauman et al, 2015). Our study only sampled from one SMCRA site and, therefore, our results did not reflect the regional changes in the fungal species pools or illustrate variations of soil chemistry among different sites within the region (Cavender et al, 2014). In addition, soil feedbacks, influenced by parent material, age of restoration, and the reclamation vegetation can ultimately influence both soil chemistry and below-ground soil fungal communities (Dickie et al, 2006;Burke et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Grassland reclamation falls under SMCRA, but has led to higher rates of soil compaction and the proliferation of widespread ground covers that slow the natural encroachment of forests (e.g., Angel et al 2009;Groninger et al 2007). The groundcover vegetation commonly used in grassland reclamation are often low diversity and exotic cool season grasses and forbs, that tend to form denser biomass cover, are shallow rooted, and aggressive (e.g., Cavender et al 2014;Bauman et al 2015;Swab et al 2017).…”
Section: Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (Smcra)mentioning
confidence: 99%