2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2010.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation complexity—The influence of plant species diversity and plant structures on plant chemical complexity and arthropods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
130
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
7
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in this study the two background odours and the delivery systems could be regarded as a major contribution in filling the volatile gap, the chemical/physical degradation of volatiles, the foraging experience of the insects and the modification of the odour plume by the natural vegetation may further explain the divergence often measured between laboratory and field studies in other insect-plant interactions (Randlkofer, Obermaier, Hilker, & Meiners 2010). While the results in our system are encouraging, we need to consider the probability that in certain plant-insect interactions, attractants active in a volatile background might not be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Although in this study the two background odours and the delivery systems could be regarded as a major contribution in filling the volatile gap, the chemical/physical degradation of volatiles, the foraging experience of the insects and the modification of the odour plume by the natural vegetation may further explain the divergence often measured between laboratory and field studies in other insect-plant interactions (Randlkofer, Obermaier, Hilker, & Meiners 2010). While the results in our system are encouraging, we need to consider the probability that in certain plant-insect interactions, attractants active in a volatile background might not be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As herbivore egg numbers or effects of antagonists on immature stages were not quantified in our study, we cannot exclude the possibility that the lower density of E. gastralis caterpillars observed in monocultures may also be related to higher rates of predation or parasitism in this stand type (Gingras et al 2003;Randlkofer et al 2010). The potential of natural enemies to reduce E. gastralis populations is indicated by a study from a Venezuelan forest reserve, which states that the abundance of this important herbivore of T. rosea is generally kept at low levels by parasitoids and predators (Hernández and Briceño 1998;Hernández and Briceño 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Avoidance of oviposition in monocultures by E. gastralis moths may also represent a search for 'enemy-free space' (Pöykkö 2011 and references therein), as a more complex vegetation and larger distances between host tree individuals can impede host localization by key enemies of a focal herbivore (Gols and Harvey 2009;Randlkofer et al 2010;Mody et al 2011). As herbivore egg numbers or effects of antagonists on immature stages were not quantified in our study, we cannot exclude the possibility that the lower density of E. gastralis caterpillars observed in monocultures may also be related to higher rates of predation or parasitism in this stand type (Gingras et al 2003;Randlkofer et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing dilution between non-host trees is an important driver of AR (Hambäck and Beckerman 2003;Jactel et al 2006;Damien et al 2016). This dilution effect on ACGW infestation rates could be explained by heterospecific neighbours acting as physical (Castagneyrol et al 2014b;Damien et al 2016) or chemical barriers (Tahvanainen and Root 1972;Randlkofer et al 2010;Jactel et al 2011) to chestnut localisation by ACGW (see also Germinara et al 2011). Blight symptoms in interaction with chestnut apparency modifies ACGW infestations…”
Section: Acgw Infestation Rates Depend On Tree Neighbour Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%