2022
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation height and structure drive foraging habitat selection of the lesser kestrel (Falco naumanni) in intensive agricultural landscapes

Abstract: Habitat selection in animals is a fundamental ecological process with key conservation implications. Assessing habitat selection in endangered species and populations occupying the extreme edges of their distribution range, or living in highly anthropized landscapes, may be of particular interest as it may provide hints to mechanisms promoting potential range expansions. We assessed second- and third-order foraging habitat selection in the northernmost European breeding population of the lesser kestrel (Falco … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we tested whether individuals from the two nest clusters differed in the bearing taken when departing on foraging trips, and then compared the bearings taken by individuals when leaving the nesting site to those of concomitantly departing and returning individuals. Indeed, lesser kestrels are non‐territorial during foraging, have been shown to use social information obtained at the colony in some contexts (nest site selection, Aparicio et al 2007, Morinay et al 2021, antipredator vigilance, Campobello et al 2012), and are known to sometimes forage in groups (typically in patches with ephemeral and high prey density, in fields being ploughed; Morganti et al 2021, Cioccarelli et al 2022). Hence, we might expect them to use foraging social information obtained at the colony, by eavesdropping on the departure or return bearings of neighbouring breeders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we tested whether individuals from the two nest clusters differed in the bearing taken when departing on foraging trips, and then compared the bearings taken by individuals when leaving the nesting site to those of concomitantly departing and returning individuals. Indeed, lesser kestrels are non‐territorial during foraging, have been shown to use social information obtained at the colony in some contexts (nest site selection, Aparicio et al 2007, Morinay et al 2021, antipredator vigilance, Campobello et al 2012), and are known to sometimes forage in groups (typically in patches with ephemeral and high prey density, in fields being ploughed; Morganti et al 2021, Cioccarelli et al 2022). Hence, we might expect them to use foraging social information obtained at the colony, by eavesdropping on the departure or return bearings of neighbouring breeders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%