2010
DOI: 10.1139/z09-125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation influences patch occupancy but not settlement and dispersal decisions in a declining migratory songbird

Abstract: Territorial clustering within larger, continuous patches of seemingly appropriate habitat could indicate that a species has additional, finer scale habitat requirements. Studying fine-scale (e.g., territory-level) habitat selection using methods that elucidate individual preferences may allow us to identify resources that influence species distributions. We examined breeding territory selection in the sagebrush Brewer's Sparrow (Spizella breweri Cassin, 1856) at the northern extent of its range to test for inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tracking individual decision-making is a more direct and potentially more reliable method of gathering information about habitat preference. For example, several studies on migratory birds have used the order in which territories are occupied in the spring to examine habitat preferences (e.g., Arlt and Part 2007;Harrison and Green 2010). Nest success and the number of fledglings produced during a nesting attempt provides information on predation rates and food availability within a habitat (Martin 1993) and is directly linked to individual fitness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracking individual decision-making is a more direct and potentially more reliable method of gathering information about habitat preference. For example, several studies on migratory birds have used the order in which territories are occupied in the spring to examine habitat preferences (e.g., Arlt and Part 2007;Harrison and Green 2010). Nest success and the number of fledglings produced during a nesting attempt provides information on predation rates and food availability within a habitat (Martin 1993) and is directly linked to individual fitness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…vaseyana), and Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis) (Huey and Travis, 1961;Fautin, 1975;McGee, 1976;Wiens and Rotenberry, 1981;Rotenberry, 1986;Wiens and others, 1986;Cannings and others, 1987;Sedgwick, 1987;Knopf and others, 1990;Kerley and Anderson, 1995;Welch, 2002Welch, , 2005Noson and others, 2006;Chalfoun and Martin, 2007;Harrison and Green, 2010;Vander Haegen and others, 2015;Rotenberry and others, 2020). Other dominant or codominant shrubs in Brewer's Sparrow habitat may include threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita), dwarf sagebrush (Artemisia scopulorum), black sagebrush (Artemisia nova), little sagebrush (also commonly referred to as low sagebrush; Artemisia arbuscula), white sage (Salvia apiana), Bigelow sage (Artemisia bigelovii), tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus), green (also commonly referred to as yellow) rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), rubber rabbitbrush (Ericameria nauseosa), greasewood (Sarcobatus spp.…”
Section: Suitable Habitatmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Within occupied sites, Brewer's Sparrow abundance was positively associated with percent cover of threetip sagebrush, parsnipflower buckwheat, silky lupine (Lupinus sericeus), sagebrush, and litter (Paczek, 2002;Paczek and Krannitz, 2005). In another study in the South Okanagan Region of British Columbia, however, Brewer's Sparrow occupancy was best predicted by the cover of big sagebrush, with the greatest likelihood of occupancy occurring at 20-25 percent cover of big sagebrush; forb cover and grass cover were not good predictors of occupancy (Harrison, 2008;Harrison and Green, 2010).…”
Section: Suitable Habitatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We averaged each vegetative characteristic to obtain a value at each study plot. These vegetation survey methods follow methods previously used in the study area to allow for direct comparison in future studies (Paczek andKrannitz 2004, Harrison andGreen 2010). Vegetation at each plot was measured at the end of the breeding season to avoid disturbing any songbird nests.…”
Section: Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 99%