2016
DOI: 10.1111/avsc.12257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities

Abstract: Aims Vegetation classification consistent with the Braun‐Blanquet approach is widely used in Europe for applied vegetation science, conservation planning and land management. During the long history of syntaxonomy, many concepts and names of vegetation units have been proposed, but there has been no single classification system integrating these units. Here we (1) present a comprehensive, hierarchical, syntaxonomic system of alliances, orders and classes of Braun‐Blanquet syntaxonomy for vascular plant, bryoph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
1,275
8
207

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,184 publications
(1,513 citation statements)
references
References 186 publications
(73 reference statements)
23
1,275
8
207
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to for the synecological descriptions, distribution, and diagnostic species lists for each association. The concepts and nomenclature of the classes and most of the follows Mucina et al (2016) and we applied the naming rules of the ICPN (Weber et al, 2000) to other high-rank syntaxa not covered by the European vegetation system (Mucina et al, 2016). In synonymy of some associations we also cite the article of the ICPN, according to which the synonym is deemed invalid or illegitimate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We refer to for the synecological descriptions, distribution, and diagnostic species lists for each association. The concepts and nomenclature of the classes and most of the follows Mucina et al (2016) and we applied the naming rules of the ICPN (Weber et al, 2000) to other high-rank syntaxa not covered by the European vegetation system (Mucina et al, 2016). In synonymy of some associations we also cite the article of the ICPN, according to which the synonym is deemed invalid or illegitimate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of the classes within the zonal-intrazonal-azonal system follows Mucina et al (2016). Foucault (1993) have 'described' a series of 'Les synusies arborescentes' under the following names:…”
Section: Syntaxonomic Survey Of Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pri tome su koordinate svih polja pridružene koordinatama fitocenološkog snimka koji je najbogatiji vrstama, u WGS 1984 koordinatnom sistemu. U prikazu istraživanih lokaliteta (Tabela 1) geografske koordinate i naziv glacijalnog jezera prate i preliminarni nazivi zabilježenih fitocenoza na nivou asocijacije ili sveze, čija je nomenklatura usklađena prema više izvora (Horvat et al, 1974;Lakušić et al, 1978;Martinčić, 1994;Školek, 2003;Landucci et al, 2013;Mucina et al, 2016). Fitocenoze su poredane tako da prate gradijent vlažnosti, od akvatičnih submerznih, preko emerznih do vlažnih terestričnih, čime se dobija uvid u zoniranje vegetacije okoline pojedinih jezera (Tabela 1).…”
unclassified
“…Syntaxonomically, this vegetation belongs to two alliances of two different classes: a) alder-ash and oak riparian floodplain forests on nutrientrich alluvial soils in the nemoral zone of Europe (Alnion incanae Pawłowski et al 1928, Alno glutinosae-Populetea albae P. Fukarek et Fabijanić 1968) and b) willow scrub on the gravelly stream banks in the submontane to subalpine belts of the Alps, the Pyrenees and the Carpathians (Salicion eleagno-daphnoidis (Moor 1958) Grass 1993, Salicetea purpureae Moor 1958) (Mucina et al, 2016). Albeit they are physiognomically and floristically different these communities are similar in a way that they thrive in the areas of constant periodic fluctuations of water level, with periods of flooding and periods of drought, and consequently disturbed and undeveloped soil (Ellenberg, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%