2021
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11040322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation Response to Removal of Plant Groups and Grass Seeding in a Microphyllous Desert Shrubland: A 4-Year Field Experiment

Abstract: Grazing is one of the most important land management activities worldwide, and cases of overgrazing increase erosion, land degradation, and plant invasion. The objective of this study was to assess the effect on individual species and species composition in response to groups of plants removals or grass seeding after four years of vegetation transformation in a microphyllous desert shrubland excluded from cattle grazing. Nine treatments involved (1) clearing of vegetation and seeding of Bouteloua curtipendula … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Responses of plant communities to cattle and horse grazing exclusion were partly species-specific, with larger values for grasses in the excluded plots and a greater number of forbs in the control plots, whereas woody species varied along the years with no differences between grazed and ungrazed sites. These results are in line with previous studies where grasses have increased in sites excluded from cattle grazing [36][37][38][39]. This suggests that this stratum has the ability to spread as a consequence of grazing exclusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Responses of plant communities to cattle and horse grazing exclusion were partly species-specific, with larger values for grasses in the excluded plots and a greater number of forbs in the control plots, whereas woody species varied along the years with no differences between grazed and ungrazed sites. These results are in line with previous studies where grasses have increased in sites excluded from cattle grazing [36][37][38][39]. This suggests that this stratum has the ability to spread as a consequence of grazing exclusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…According to the growth analysis, B. gracilis showed a slightly higher growth rate than C. ciliaris, differentiating after 56 DAEE, highlighting the CHR treatment with exponential growth rates of 1.0 (R 2 = 0.94) and 1.09 (R 2 = 0.94) in C. ciliaris and B. gracilis, respectively (Figure 3a,b). These differences in the growth and development dynamics between the grass species suggest that they are more related to their phylogenetic nature [45,46], although both were favored by a higher soil moisture content when CHR was applied. This indicates a good adaptability of both species to degraded soils under a regular rainfall regime.…”
Section: Plant Growth and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, management through different tools is required to restore, to some degree, the ecological processes of the plant community (native species, regeneration, species richness, etc.) [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%