2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vehicle axle loads identification using finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhu and Law [11] utilise an orthogonal function method in the identification of moving loads. Law et al [12] use a finite element method to identify the axle loads and a condensation technique to reduce the system to a smaller number of master degrees of freedom. For a more detailed review of the state of the art in MFI, see Yu et al [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu and Law [11] utilise an orthogonal function method in the identification of moving loads. Law et al [12] use a finite element method to identify the axle loads and a condensation technique to reduce the system to a smaller number of master degrees of freedom. For a more detailed review of the state of the art in MFI, see Yu et al [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However it has been considered in only a small proportion of moving force identification problems (Chan et al 1999, Law et al 2004, Pinkaew 2006, Deng and Cai 2010b, Wu and Law 2011. In this paper, the vehicle-bridge interaction is modelled as a coupled system as the solution is given at each time step and no iteration is required in the computational process.…”
Section: Coupled Vehicle-bridge Interaction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu and Chan (2007) provide a comprehensive literature review of this research. Methods which utilise the MFI technique can typically be categorised into one of two groups: (a) those which use discrete bridge models and the finite element (FE) method (Chan and Yung 2000, Law et al 2004, Pinkaew 2006 Asnachinda 2007) and (b) those which are based on an exact solution method including a form of system identification (Law et al 1997, Chan et al 1999, Yu and Chan 2003a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the late 1990s and early 2000s, several researchers, investigated the differences between theoretical B-WIM algorithms and bridge measurements, both theoretically using complex vehicle-bridge dynamic interaction models and experimentally using data from four bridge sites (González 2010;González and OBrien 1998;Law et al 1997;Law et al 1999;Yu and Chan 2003;Zhu and Law 2001;Law et al 2004;Law and Fang 2001). The influence of dynamics and multiple sensors on the accuracy of B-WIM systems is addressed.…”
Section: Dynamic Models and Moving Force Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%