2018
DOI: 10.1177/0954407018794259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vehicle crash optimization considering a roof crush test and a side impact test

Abstract: The vehicle performances for the side impact test and the roof crush test are dependent on the side structure design of a vehicle. Crash optimization can be employed to enhance the performances. A meta-model-based structural optimization technique is generally utilized in the optimization process since the technique is simple to use. However, the meta-model-based optimization is not suitable for problems with many design variables such as topology and topometry optimizations. A crash optimization methodology i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also modified the structure with implicit parameterization technology, which reduced the total body mass by 32.41 kg, while the passive safety performance in frontal and side impact scenarios was almost unchanged. Lee et al [8] proposed a collision optimization method that simultaneously considered side impact tests and roof extrusion tests. Topological optimization was used to design the B-pillar stiffener, which reduced the body mass while meeting the crashworthiness requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also modified the structure with implicit parameterization technology, which reduced the total body mass by 32.41 kg, while the passive safety performance in frontal and side impact scenarios was almost unchanged. Lee et al [8] proposed a collision optimization method that simultaneously considered side impact tests and roof extrusion tests. Topological optimization was used to design the B-pillar stiffener, which reduced the body mass while meeting the crashworthiness requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear dynamic response optimization can be converted to an iterative "linear optimization ↔ nonlinear analysis" process by using the ESL. Many researchers carried out crashworthiness design of automobile frontal structure [20], roof structure [21], front hood panel [22][23][24], and B-pillar [25]. The ESL method bring convenience to solve topometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major reasons for this phenomenon are that the side parts of the vehicle are poorly designed with energy absorption components with respect to engine compartment or trunk [10][11][12]. What's more, the back mirrors and looking ahead are insufficient to provide all the information about adjacent paths [13]. A high frequency of watching the surrounding environment probably is hard for an ordinary driver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%