2016 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/jcsse.2016.7748886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vehicle detection and classification system based on virtual detection zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the Montevideo Audio and Video Dataset (MAVD), which contains data on different levels of traffic activity and social use characteristics in Montevideo city, Uruguay, was used as the other traffic data set [30]. Finally, GARM Road-Traffic Monitoring (GRAM-RTM) data set [21] has four categories (i.e., cars, trucks, vans, and big-trucks). e total number of different objects in each sequence is 256 for M-30, 235 for M-30-HD, and 237 for Urban 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, the Montevideo Audio and Video Dataset (MAVD), which contains data on different levels of traffic activity and social use characteristics in Montevideo city, Uruguay, was used as the other traffic data set [30]. Finally, GARM Road-Traffic Monitoring (GRAM-RTM) data set [21] has four categories (i.e., cars, trucks, vans, and big-trucks). e total number of different objects in each sequence is 256 for M-30, 235 for M-30-HD, and 237 for Urban 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the MAVD and GRAM-RTM Data Sets. MAVD traffic data set [30] and GARM Road-Traffic Monitoring (GRAM-RTM) data set [21] were used for evaluating the vehicle counting performance of the proposed method. e videos were recorded with a GoPro Hero 3 camera at a frame rate of 30 fps and a resolution of 1920 × 1080 px.…”
Section: Comparison Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional vehicle-detection methods are mainly divided into two types: (1) Static-based methods [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] that use sliding windows or shape feature comparison methods to generate vehicle prediction frames and verify them based on the information in the prediction frames and (2) methods that use the dynamic features of a moving object [8][9][10][11][12] to separate it from the image to obtain the contour of the object. Regarding static-based methods, Mohamed et al [1] proposed a vehicledetection system that uses Haar-like features to extract vehicle shape features and inputs the extracted features into an artificial neural network to realize vehicle classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test results get 97.22% accuracy for light traffic conditions, 79.63% accuracy for heavy traffic conditions and 100% accuracy for the consistency of average object tracking. In [7], Nilakorn et al used the GMM algorithm for vehicle detection and the k-NN algorithm for vehicle classification. This research uses three classification categories namely small-size (bicycle, motorcycle), mid-size (car, van, small truck), and large-size (big truck, bus).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%