2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3049741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vehicle Detection in Aerial Images Based on 3D Depth Maps and Deep Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the route with less traffic volume, less density, less distance to the destination, and high vehicle speed, the optimal path is selected. The fitness of the solution is computed by using Equation (18). The objective is to minimize the fitness.…”
Section: Fitness Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the route with less traffic volume, less density, less distance to the destination, and high vehicle speed, the optimal path is selected. The fitness of the solution is computed by using Equation (18). The objective is to minimize the fitness.…”
Section: Fitness Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The miss in detection is prevented with the suggested sensor setup as there is less chance of the sensor being by passed. Javadi et al 18 presented a unique method for detecting vehicles from aerial images using deep neural networks and 3D feature maps. The vehicles were detected using a YOLOv3 detector that includes DenseNet‐201, MobileNet‐v2, Squeeze Net, and DarkNet‐53.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[79] Comparison among faster R-CNN, R-FCN, and SSD (Best model) [80] Optimized DL model considering feature extraction, object detection, and non-maximum suppression. [81] Small-Sized Vehicle Detection Network (AVDNet) (one-stage vehicle detection network) [82] Comparison among four object detection networks: D-YOLO (best model), YOLOV2, YOLOV3, and YOLT [83] Vehicle detection based on RetinaNet architecture [84] Model based on Alexnet network (classification) and Faster R-CNN (target detection) [85] Faster R-CNN with a improved feature-balanced pyramid network (FBPN) [86] Comparison among YOLOv3, YOLOv4 (best models), and Faster R-CNN [87] Super-resolution cyclic GAN with RFA and YOLO as the detection network (SRCGAN-RFA-YOLO) 1, 2 [88] Modified YOLOv3 and fcNN using 3D features in cascade. [16] Method using the lightweight feature extraction network with the Faster R-CNN [17] Orientation-Aware Vehicle Detection with an Anchor-Free Object Detection approach…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between conventional nature images and drone images make OD di cult. First, objects in such images are scaled differently [7]. Far objects are small, while near ones are big.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%