2019
DOI: 10.1109/lnet.2019.2929026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications for Platooning: Safety Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsection VI-A demonstrates the accuracy of the analysis of standstill spacing and braking duration by the DDEs, including the crossing criterion and the determination of d end and t end based on RK4. Next, in subsection VI-B, the improved performance of the proposed RSD algorithm is presented via comparison with four related algorithms, namely, the car-following algorithm [25], the feedback control algorithm [26], the maximum braking algorithm [27], and the fixed setting algorithm using the same control laws [6]. Finally, in subsection VI-C, the relationship among the limits of the stable velocity, the delay and the stable distance is presented as a reference for platoon control while ensuring safety.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Subsection VI-A demonstrates the accuracy of the analysis of standstill spacing and braking duration by the DDEs, including the crossing criterion and the determination of d end and t end based on RK4. Next, in subsection VI-B, the improved performance of the proposed RSD algorithm is presented via comparison with four related algorithms, namely, the car-following algorithm [25], the feedback control algorithm [26], the maximum braking algorithm [27], and the fixed setting algorithm using the same control laws [6]. Finally, in subsection VI-C, the relationship among the limits of the stable velocity, the delay and the stable distance is presented as a reference for platoon control while ensuring safety.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, an experimental platform and an actual-vehicle experiment were set up to evaluate emergency braking [24], but delay was not considered. Several works have considered delays in emergency braking [25]- [27]. For instance, Flores et al [25] presented a cooperative collision avoidance system based on pedestrian prediction, in which delay was considered merely in the correction of velocity, and in-vehicle safety was ignored.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations