2013
DOI: 10.1111/insp.12019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Veil Dressing and the Gender Geopolitics of “What Not to Wear”

Abstract: This essay examines controversies in the European Union around legislation that bans women from dressing in a "visibly Muslim" way in public. It brings together two usually separate domains of inquiry to reconsider geopolitical, emotional, and intellectual crosscurrents of these ostensibly national controversies in parts of the EU. I argue that these two domains need addressing in tandem to generate new insights and move scholarly debates that have become polarized in turn. The first strand is critiques of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smith et al (2016) describe bodies as territorial "agents." In an "intimate geopolitics" (Smith, 2012), the boundaries of state and nation are forged, contested, and rejected within bodies through violence (Mayer, 2004;Slack, 2015), social reproduction (Clark, 2015(Clark, , 2016Harker, 2011), biological reproduction (Fannin, 2012, McKinnon, 2014, Smith, 2009, Smith, 2012, migration (Mountz, 2011;Nagel, 2002), emotions and affect (Faria 2014, Laketa, 2016, Pain, 2009, Jackson, 2016, McGinty, 2014, consumption (Evered & Evered, 2016, Faria, 2014, Fluri, 2009, Franklin, 2013, Gökariksel, 2012, Gökariksel & Secor, 2010. Dixon (2015) pushes a feminist material critique further by urging geographers to "query the geofrom another direction" (p. 47).…”
Section: Embodying the Middle Eastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith et al (2016) describe bodies as territorial "agents." In an "intimate geopolitics" (Smith, 2012), the boundaries of state and nation are forged, contested, and rejected within bodies through violence (Mayer, 2004;Slack, 2015), social reproduction (Clark, 2015(Clark, , 2016Harker, 2011), biological reproduction (Fannin, 2012, McKinnon, 2014, Smith, 2009, Smith, 2012, migration (Mountz, 2011;Nagel, 2002), emotions and affect (Faria 2014, Laketa, 2016, Pain, 2009, Jackson, 2016, McGinty, 2014, consumption (Evered & Evered, 2016, Faria, 2014, Fluri, 2009, Franklin, 2013, Gökariksel, 2012, Gökariksel & Secor, 2010. Dixon (2015) pushes a feminist material critique further by urging geographers to "query the geofrom another direction" (p. 47).…”
Section: Embodying the Middle Eastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies around the ban focused primarily on the pretexts for the unveiling process. According to Franklin (2013), the ban represents orientalists discourse around Muslim women. Open society justice initiative (2011: 5) categorized the ban as Xenophobia, which fed on the fear of difference and the unfamiliar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies around the ban focused primarily on the pretexts for the unveiling process. According to Franklin (2013), the ban represents orientalists discourse around Muslim women. Open society justice initiative (2011: 5) categorized the ban as Xenophobia, which fed on the fear of difference and the unfamiliar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%