Velocity and acceleration before contact in the tackle during rugby union matches

Abstract

The velocity and acceleration at which the ball-carrier or tackler enters the tackle may contribute to winning the contest and prevailing injury free. Velocity and acceleration have been quantified in controlled settings, whereas in match-play it has been subjectively described. The purpose of this study was to determine the velocity and acceleration of the ball-carrier and tackler before contact during match-play in three competitions (Super 14, Varsity Cup, and Under-19 Currie Cup). Using a two-dimensional scaled version of the field, the velocity and acceleration of the ball-carrier and tackler were measured at every 0.1 s to contact for 0.5 s. For front-on tackles, a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the ball-carrier (4.6 ± 1 m · s⁻¹) and tackler (7.1 ± 3.5 m · s⁻¹) was found at the 0.5 s time to contact interval in the Varsity Cup. For side-on tackles, differences between the two opposing players were found at 0.5 s (ball-carrier: 4.6 ± 1.7 m · s⁻¹; tackler: 3.1 ± 1.2 m · s⁻¹) and 0.4 s (ball-carrier: 6.3 ± 2.3 m · s⁻¹; tackler: 3.7 ± 1.6 m · s⁻¹) at Under-19 level. After 0.4 s, no significant differences (P > 0.05) were evident. Also, the ball-carrier's velocity over the 0.5 s was relatively stable compared with that of the tackler. Results suggest that tacklers adjust their velocity to reach a suitable relative velocity before making contact with the ball-carrier.

Assessment of model-based image-matching for future reconstruction of unhelmeted sport head impact kinematics

“…The striking vehicle buck was mounted on the sled and propelled into a stationary adult male cadaver in mid-gait stance ( Figure 1) at 40km/h (11 m/s). This is similar to the average relative impact velocity (10.4 m/s) in elite level rugby union tackling (Hendricks, Karpul, Nicolls, & Lambert, 2012). Although the impact appears planar in Figure 1, the head exhibits substantial six degree of freedom motion (as will be seen in Figures The 3D motion data of the cadaver head in the pedestrian impact test were captured with a Vicon MX (Oxford, UK) optoelectronic motion capture system.…”

Cortical Hypoexcitation Defines Neuronal Responses in the Immediate Aftermath of Traumatic Brain Injury

“…[16]), and it has strong construct validity in that the impact velocities seen in this model are very comparable to those seen in front-end car-car and car-barrier accidents [20]–[23], for pedestrians in car-pedestrian accidents [24], [25] and in forceful sporting field accidents [26]. Thus it is likely that our model involves the same sort of damage processes as seen in humans sustaining a blow to the head and creates the same sort of damage as occurs to humans under those conditions.…”

Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Implementation of the BokSmartSafe SixInjury Prevention Programme: a study protocol

“…Tackle technique is consistently associated with both injury and performance, and the teaching and prescription of tackle technique is an important component in nationwide prevention programmes 14 16 31–33. Hendricks et al 14 illustrated how the shoulder tackle, as opposed to the arm tackle and jersey tackle, is the most effective and safest tackle for rugby players to execute.…”