1985
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3886(85)90025-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Velocity distribution on the Masuda panel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4), and include the N = 3 case studied earlier [13]. The Shannon-Nyquist theorem [14,15] demands N > 2 for effective transport, in agreement with experiments [16]. The solution for N = 128 is indistinguishable graphically from Eq.…”
Section: D Stationary-electrode Modelmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…(4), and include the N = 3 case studied earlier [13]. The Shannon-Nyquist theorem [14,15] demands N > 2 for effective transport, in agreement with experiments [16]. The solution for N = 128 is indistinguishable graphically from Eq.…”
Section: D Stationary-electrode Modelmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…In the 2D EC the additional force of gravity in the equations of motion make the system codimension 3. For the rest of this discussion we set g = 0.1 because for certain values of A and β it is found to produce results on a convenient dimensionless timescale that are similar to those discussed in the literature 5,13,16,17,[34][35][36] . It is worth clarifying this choice of g because it may seem that g = 0.1 and our choice of A values in the 1D EC section violate the inequality in Eq.…”
Section: Two Dimensional Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be in part due to the fact that particle dynamics induced by an EC are complex and still not well understood. The motion of particles in EC fields has been studied both experimentally and computationally by a number of investigators [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] . These investigations have shown a variety of different propagating and stationary modes, including the recent report of intermittent changes of many-body particle motion discovered by Chesnutt and Marshall 15 in a discrete-element simulation of transport on inclined ECs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to the large number of studies on traveling waves on electric curtains, relatively little attention has been paid to particle motion in a standing-wave electric curtain. According to Hemstreet [24] the particle motion in a standing-wave curtain can be subjected to two movement modes. In one mode, the particle levitates above the surface and oscillates back and forth without leaving the curtain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%