2000
DOI: 10.13031/2013.2748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Velocity Field Measurements at an Overfall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent developments in acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) techniques make it possible to obtain detailed velocity measurements not only in relatively large channels (e.g. Robinson et al, 2000) but also in much narrower streams such as a rill. By using a miniaturized acoustic Doppler velocimeter (mADV) detailed velocity measurements are now possible in flows with a width of only 75 mm and a depth of only 20 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) techniques make it possible to obtain detailed velocity measurements not only in relatively large channels (e.g. Robinson et al, 2000) but also in much narrower streams such as a rill. By using a miniaturized acoustic Doppler velocimeter (mADV) detailed velocity measurements are now possible in flows with a width of only 75 mm and a depth of only 20 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While flume-based investigations of engineered jumps may span values of 4 ≤ F 1 ≤ 14 (Vischer and Hager, 1998), previous field investigations have not reported natural Froude numbers larger than 2 (Kieffer, 1990;Grant, 1997;Tinkler, 1997b,c;Tinkler and Wohl, 1998b). In part, this discrepancy arises from an ability to induce high F 1 values with a flume sluice gate and an inability to measure field-based values of F 1 in high-velocity and highly aerated flows (Abt et al, 1989;Robinson, 1989;Robinson et al, 2000;Vallé and Pasternack, 2002a). Because F 1 values of 2-4 have been hypothesized to be common in mountain systems (Tinkler and Wohl, 1998b), large natural knickpoints (Tinkler and Wohl, 1998a;Wohl, 2000) are likely to have flow conditions similar to the range of conditions discussed in Peterka (1983).…”
Section: Supercritical Flow Values In Natural Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is called the end-depth method [4]- [18]. Gill [19], Robinson [20] [21], Wu and Rajaratnam [23], Davis et al [11], Robinson et al [24] and Lin et al [25] measured the water stage at the downstream end of the drop, including the nappe or tail water depth. They focused on the steady water surface and measured its profile using single-point instruments such as a point gauge, pressure transmitter, and wave gauge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%