1991
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1991.13.1.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Velocity-Specific and Mode-Specific Effects of Eccentric Isokinetic Training of the Hamstrings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A further interesting observation was that the gains in eccentric peak torque with NHE training occurred independent of the training velocity. These findings are consistent with other reports in the literature (Duncan et al, 1989;Ryan et al, 1991;Paddon-Jones et al, 2001;Shepstone et al, 2005) and suggest that although the NHE is performed at low velocity, training results in adaptations that are transferable to high velocity movements. As hamstrings strain injuries are typically incurred during high velocity actions, these observations have clear implications for injury prevention and rehabilitation; the adaptation to eccentric-based resistance training may confer protection against stretch forces during high velocity lengthening actions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A further interesting observation was that the gains in eccentric peak torque with NHE training occurred independent of the training velocity. These findings are consistent with other reports in the literature (Duncan et al, 1989;Ryan et al, 1991;Paddon-Jones et al, 2001;Shepstone et al, 2005) and suggest that although the NHE is performed at low velocity, training results in adaptations that are transferable to high velocity movements. As hamstrings strain injuries are typically incurred during high velocity actions, these observations have clear implications for injury prevention and rehabilitation; the adaptation to eccentric-based resistance training may confer protection against stretch forces during high velocity lengthening actions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The lack of specificity to velocity in the trained limb of the fast-training group is consistent with previous studies that found that high velocity training, especially with eccentric contractions, results in strength gains in the trained limb at the training velocity and also at lower velocities (Duncan et al 1989;Ryan et al 1991;Paddon-Jones et al 2001). The specificity to velocity in the untrained limb of the fast-training group was contrary to our original hypothesis, which was based on observations of lack of specificity in trained limbs (Duncan et al 1989;Ryan et al 1991;Paddon-Jones et al 2001). The differences in specificity of training for the trained versus untrained limbs suggests that there may be differences in neural mechanisms involved in strength gains in the trained and untrained limbs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For example, when training at fast velocities [120-300°s -1 (2.09-5.2 rad s -1 )] increases in torque in the trained limb are often evident at lower velocities, in addition to the training velocity (Coyle et al 1981;. This is especially evident during eccentric training (Duncan et al 1989;Ryan et al 1991;Paddon-Jones et al 2001). It is not known if this lack of specificity at high velocities is also evident in the untrained limb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…5). Highvelocity training has shown less specificity for strength than low-velocity training in the past (Coyle et al 1981;Bell et al 1992), especially eccentrically (Duncan et al 1989;Ryan et al 1991;Paddon-Jones et al 2001), but specificity of contraction type has been repeatedly shown in previous studies (Tomberlin et al 1991;Higbie et al 1996;Hortoba´ygi et al 1996aHortoba´ygi et al ,b, 1997. The studies that reported specificity to contraction type all used training velocities lower than our training velocity (180°s )1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%