2018
DOI: 10.1600/036364418x697256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venation Patterns in Mimosa subseries Dolentes and Brevipedes (Leguminosae) and their Taxonomical Inferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conspicuous and prominent marginal vein is a diagnostic character of this species, which was mentioned by . A morphologically similar marginal vein also has been observed in other taxa of Cassiinae: Although the leaflet venation pattern has been little used in taxonomic studies of Leguminosae, it proved to be useful in Mimosa (Grohar et al 2018), Crotalaria (Devecchi et al 2014), Bauhinia (Fortunato et al 2017) and Chamaecrista (Coutinho et al 2016). In this perspective, the high resolution X-ray digital images of leaflet venation supported our analysis, without destroying the leaflets.…”
Section: Additional Specimens Examined (supporting
confidence: 83%
“…The conspicuous and prominent marginal vein is a diagnostic character of this species, which was mentioned by . A morphologically similar marginal vein also has been observed in other taxa of Cassiinae: Although the leaflet venation pattern has been little used in taxonomic studies of Leguminosae, it proved to be useful in Mimosa (Grohar et al 2018), Crotalaria (Devecchi et al 2014), Bauhinia (Fortunato et al 2017) and Chamaecrista (Coutinho et al 2016). In this perspective, the high resolution X-ray digital images of leaflet venation supported our analysis, without destroying the leaflets.…”
Section: Additional Specimens Examined (supporting
confidence: 83%
“…In sect. Mimosa, other anatomical (Grohar et al, 2016;Grohar et al, 2018; and also morphometric and chromosomic data could help re-evaluate the supraspecific categories established only on morphological similarities (Barneby, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a supraspecific level, the wax micromorphology by itself is not as relevant for the distinction between the sections Calothamnos and Mimosa as other anatomical (Grohar et al, 2016;Grohar et al, 2018; and also complex morphometric and cytogenetic analyses (Morales et al, 2018) could help reevaluate the supraspecific categories established only on morphological similarities (Barneby, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%