SPWLA 63rd Annual Symposium Transactions 2022
DOI: 10.30632/spwla-2022-0111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vendor-Independent Stochastic Inversion Models of Azimuthal Resistivity LWD Data, Case Studies From the Norwegian Continental Shelf

Abstract: Drilling horizontal wells in complex formations is always a challenging task. The development of deep and ultra-deep azimuthal resistivity tools has largely improved the accuracy of the wellbore placement in the target zone. The enhanced imaging provided by the stochastic inversion of the azimuthal resistivity data can be applied for mapping both the internal reservoir structure and fluid contacts in the field. Major oil and gas service companies provide the operator with azimuthal resistivity tools and develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other type, by AziTrak and ViziTrak of Baker Hughes, uses an orthogonal antenna (Bell et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2007;Fang et al, 2008;Rabinovich et al, 2011). According to the detection range, EM boundary detection LWD tools can be divided into the azimuthal electromagnetic resistivity LWD tool (Hawkins et al, 2015) and the ultra-deep azimuthal electromagnetic resistivity LWD detection logging tool (Wu et al, 2019;Nemushchenko et al, 2022;Zhu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other type, by AziTrak and ViziTrak of Baker Hughes, uses an orthogonal antenna (Bell et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2007;Fang et al, 2008;Rabinovich et al, 2011). According to the detection range, EM boundary detection LWD tools can be divided into the azimuthal electromagnetic resistivity LWD tool (Hawkins et al, 2015) and the ultra-deep azimuthal electromagnetic resistivity LWD detection logging tool (Wu et al, 2019;Nemushchenko et al, 2022;Zhu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%