2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venous air embolism and the sitting position: A case series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on TEE and information from the operators, we believe that the CO 2 directly entered the venous circulation via the torn RVOT. Previous studies reported venous air embolism that was more common when the patient was in the sitting position during neurosurgical cases [7,8]. Because our patient was in the Trendelenburg position and central venous pressure was 8-12 mmHg during the anastomosis, it seems unlikely that air was aspirated into the venous system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Based on TEE and information from the operators, we believe that the CO 2 directly entered the venous circulation via the torn RVOT. Previous studies reported venous air embolism that was more common when the patient was in the sitting position during neurosurgical cases [7,8]. Because our patient was in the Trendelenburg position and central venous pressure was 8-12 mmHg during the anastomosis, it seems unlikely that air was aspirated into the venous system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Two of its main advantages are an optimal biomechanical condition of intracranial compartments of the patients and an ideal ergonomic position for the surgeons. However, despite several studies confirming its relative safety, the sitting position is burdened by significant complications that, according to some authors, even balance the aforementioned advantages [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of VAE reported for similar procedures ranges between 1 and 9% with differences due largely to patient positioning and methods of detecting and properly identifying VAE [1][2][3] . In the sitting position, it is postulated that the risk of VAE rises due to an increased negative pressure gradient between the operative site and the right atrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the sitting position, it is postulated that the risk of VAE rises due to an increased negative pressure gradient between the operative site and the right atrium. This pressure gradient is further enhanced in awake patients who are spontaneously breathing, due to the negative intrathoracic pressure generated with each breath during the inspiratory phase [1] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%