2011
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.93b4.25731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venous thromboembolic events following foot and ankle surgery in the English National Health Service

Abstract: Diagnostic and operative codes are routinely collected for every patient admitted to hospital in the English NHS. Data on post-operative complications following foot and ankle surgery have not previously been available in large numbers. Data on symptomatic venous thromboembolism events and mortality within 90 days were extracted for patients undergoing fixation of an ankle fracture, first metatarsal osteotomy, hindfoot fusions and total ankle replacement over a period of 42 months. For ankle fracture surgery (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
89
3
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
89
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9][10] The decision whether or not to use thrombosis chemoprophylaxis is therefore decided by weighing up the patient's risk for bleeding against the risk of developing VTE. No universal guidelines are available, although the general consensus from various bodies [31,34,38,40] and published articles [6,12,13,21,22,24,25,27,30,33,39] is that use of prophylactic anticoagulation is not advocated in foot and ankle surgery In a previous prospective study, [37] we found that the absolute number of cases of VTE after foot and ankle surgery was unacceptably high (11/130 (8.5%)), although this was not statistically significant owing to the relatively small number of cases. We identified a cohort of patients who were particularly prone to developing VTE after foot and ankle surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7][8][9][10] The decision whether or not to use thrombosis chemoprophylaxis is therefore decided by weighing up the patient's risk for bleeding against the risk of developing VTE. No universal guidelines are available, although the general consensus from various bodies [31,34,38,40] and published articles [6,12,13,21,22,24,25,27,30,33,39] is that use of prophylactic anticoagulation is not advocated in foot and ankle surgery In a previous prospective study, [37] we found that the absolute number of cases of VTE after foot and ankle surgery was unacceptably high (11/130 (8.5%)), although this was not statistically significant owing to the relatively small number of cases. We identified a cohort of patients who were particularly prone to developing VTE after foot and ankle surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A database study in the National Health Service in the UK found that the rate of symptomatic VTED following ankle fracture surgery, total ankle replacement, hindfoot arthrodesis or first metatarsal surgery was <0.3% for each type of surgery. [34] Mizel et al [21] found prevalences of symptomatic DVT and non-fatal PE of 0.22% and 0.15%, respectively.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jameson et al studied the National Health Service hospital database and suggested ankle fracture fixation in patients over 50 as being a risk factor for VTE. 6 After studying the American…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature the question of whether TAR patients need thromboprophylaxis or not remains unanswered. Jameson et al [82] analyzed venous thrombembolic events following foot and ankle surgery in the English National Health Service between January 2005 and June 2008. In total, 1633 patients with TAR were included into this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 1633 patients with TAR were included into this study. No deep vein thrombosis and only case of non-fatal pulmonary embolism (0.061 %) were observed [82]. However, in recent literature the incidence of thrombembolic complications should not be underestimated [23,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%