“…Compared with other empirical studies on IAQ and COVID-19, the similarities between them are that they all explore ways of improving IAQ to reduce the spread of COVID-19 [ 13 , 14 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 ], however, the biggest difference is the design and choice of research methods. For example, most of the studies have used instrumental monitoring [ 13 , 14 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 28 , 29 ], and a few have used literature reviews [ 20 ] or participant observation [ 26 ]. Accordingly, this research has the following characteristics: first, this is a first-hand survey of Taiwanese people’s perceptions of epidemic prevention and IAQ, and it also explores the public’s acceptance of the “Clean and Safe” mark; second, the questionnaire design included the background information of the respondents, their opinions on epidemic prevention strategies and IAQ, and at the same time, it inquired about the possibility of establishing “Clean and Safe” marks, and through seven indoor places frequently visited by the public, the research compared their differences; finally, the survey also conducted an in-depth analysis based on the geographic location of the respondents to explore the impact of different actual living environments.…”