1992
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1992.01880050041010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventilation Tube Removal: Indications for Paper Patch Myringoplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The success rate of procedure in our study is 91.2% which is similar to or better than that reported by various authors. 11,[14][15][16][17][18][19] However, our general success rate is lower than that reported by Lou et al 17 In their study, almost 98% of 504 cases with traumatic TM perforations were acute onset (within 1 month after a trauma), and a spontaneous healing rate of 89% cases was reported. In our study, all perforations with traumatic etiology healed well, whereas the ones in which the procedure failed had inflammatory etiology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The success rate of procedure in our study is 91.2% which is similar to or better than that reported by various authors. 11,[14][15][16][17][18][19] However, our general success rate is lower than that reported by Lou et al 17 In their study, almost 98% of 504 cases with traumatic TM perforations were acute onset (within 1 month after a trauma), and a spontaneous healing rate of 89% cases was reported. In our study, all perforations with traumatic etiology healed well, whereas the ones in which the procedure failed had inflammatory etiology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Perforations can lead to pain, increased susceptibility to infection, cholesteatoma formation, nonphysiologic gas exchange, and tympanosclerosis, and contribute to conductive hearing loss. Small central TM perforations that do not heal may be reconstructed with a paper patch myringoplasty; however, the efficacy of this technique is questionable 9. After myringoplasty failure, autologous graft material is often utilized to surgically reconstruct the TM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is to act as a scaffold for the migration of epithelium and consequent closure of the defect. The materials used in previous studies have included silastic sheeting [12], gelfoam patching [13,20], gelfilm patching [6,13,20,23], gelfoam plug [14], steri-strip TM (3 M) or paper patching [5,6,[15][16][17][18][19], fat plug [6,21] and trichloroacetic acid [22]. The majority of these studies (see Table 1) were retrospective reviews and only one [12] was a randomised non-blinded controlled trial in which the incidence of persistent perforation was observed following freshening of the edges of the perforation and freshening of the edges with application of silastic sheeting to the defect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%