Objective Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) and synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (sNIPPV) were the new modes of non-invasive ventilation. This study’s aim was to clarify as to which of the nHFOV and sNIPPV modes was superior in preventing post-extubation failure or reintubation in neonates.
Study Design An open-label parallel randomized study was performed. Extubated preterm and term neonates were randomly allocated into nHFOV or sNIPPV modes; the reintubation rate was evaluated within 7 days after extubation between the two modes. Subgroup analyses were performed for preterm (gestational age < 37 weeks) and very preterm (gestational age < 32 weeks) neonates. The sample calculation was 1,050 neonates; however, this trial was stopped early as enrolment was too slow.
<b>Results</b> From July 2020 to June 2022, 202 neonates were assessed for eligibility and 69 neonates were excluded. Finally, 133 neonates were randomly allocated to the study interventions (nHFOV = 67, sNIPPV = 66). The median gestational age and birth weight were 33 (30–37) weeks and 1,910 (1,355–2,836) g, respectively. The reintubation rate within 7 days did not significantly differ between the groups (nHFOV [5/67, 7%] vs. sNIPPV [4/66, 6%]); risk difference [95% confidence interval] = 0.01 [-0.08–0.11]; <i>p</i> = 0.99); including preterm (nHFOV [4/55, 7%] vs. sNIPPV [3/44, 7%]) and very preterm (nHFOV [3/25, 12%] vs. sNIPPV [3/25, 12%]) neonates.
<b>Conclusion</b> After neonatal extubation, there was no significant difference of reintubation rates within 7 days between nHFOV and sNIPPV.