2010
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.21358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventilatory response to added dead space and position in preterm infants at high risk age for SIDS

Abstract: International audienceObjective: The vulnerability of prematurely born infants to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) in the prone position might be explained by a reduced ability to respond to a stress, such as hypercarbia, in that position; our objective, therefore, was to further explore the influence of position on the response to a stress. Working hypothesis: The ability of prematurely born infants to respond to added dead space in the prone compared to the supine position would be impaired at the high ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the infants had a significantly lower P 0.1 in the prone compared to the supine position, confirming our earlier findings 6. As above, P 0.1 is influenced by respiratory muscle strength, but we found no significant differences in the Pimax results between positions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the infants had a significantly lower P 0.1 in the prone compared to the supine position, confirming our earlier findings 6. As above, P 0.1 is influenced by respiratory muscle strength, but we found no significant differences in the Pimax results between positions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There was, however, no tendency for differences in the P 0.1 or P 0.1 /Pimax levels between prone and supine to vary by CO 2 level, that is the infants did not have a lower ventilatory response to the CO 2 challenge in the prone compared to the supine position. This does not contradict our previous results6 as we demonstrated a slower ventilatory response to added dead space in the prone compared to the supine position rather than a difference in the size of the response. Indeed, in both positions, the infants were able to fully compensate for the added dead space, but they did it more slowly in the prone position 6.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such increases in EEV can significantly impair diaphragm performance, and, as Rehan and colleagues conclude, ‘in adults, diaphragm strength and endurance as well as the efficiency of breathing are reduced by 40%–50% with this magnitude of increase in lung volume’. Greenough and colleagues have reported similar results in several clinical studies with premature infants and observe that respiratory muscle strength is significantly reduced in the prone compared to the supine position in ( 106–108 ).…”
Section: The Prone Sleeping Position and Sidsmentioning
confidence: 57%