2015
DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000000433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventilatory Support in Children With Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Abstract: The Consensus Conference developed pediatric-specific recommendations regarding mechanical ventilation of the patient with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome as well as future research priorities. These recommendations are intended to initiate discussion regarding optimal mechanical ventilation management for children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome and identify areas of controversy requiring further investigation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
63
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…They recommend that in patients in controlled mechanical ventilation modes, using tidal volumes in or below the physiologic range for age and body weight; that is 5–8mL/kg IBW. Furthermore, tidal volume should be adjusted with disease severity, with even lower volumes of 3–6mL/kg IBW for patients with poor respiratory system compliance(22). Both these recommendations received approximately 80% agreement between the consensus members, with all members calling for more robust research to evaluate the impact of tidal volume on outcomes in children with PARDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They recommend that in patients in controlled mechanical ventilation modes, using tidal volumes in or below the physiologic range for age and body weight; that is 5–8mL/kg IBW. Furthermore, tidal volume should be adjusted with disease severity, with even lower volumes of 3–6mL/kg IBW for patients with poor respiratory system compliance(22). Both these recommendations received approximately 80% agreement between the consensus members, with all members calling for more robust research to evaluate the impact of tidal volume on outcomes in children with PARDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a decrease in driving pressure concomitant to a reduction in tidal volume or an increase in PEEP were associated with increased survival, while differences in tidal volume were not associated with different survival rates when the driving pressure was constant 5 . In ARDS, the proportion of lung available for ventilation is markedly decreased; therefore, the driving pressure (and consequently tidal volume) should be adapted to this reality rather than using only predicted body weight 11 . However, it is important to note that this approach should be adapted depending on the patient’s condition.…”
Section: Advances In Optimization and Customization Of Mechanical Venmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, management of these children has been confined to a lung-protective mechanical ventilation (MV) strategy entailing low tidal volume ( V T ) of 6 mL/kg body weight, limiting peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and/or plateau pressure ( P plat ) to 30 cmH 2 O and the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) [3, 4]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%