2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventricular Assist Device Support as a Bridge to Transplantation in Pediatric Patients

Abstract: For one-quarter of a century, major advances have occurred in mechanical support technology for children, thereby expanding the capability to bridge to HTx without compromising post-HTx outcomes. Significant challenges remain, especially for neonates and patients with CHD, but ongoing innovation portends improved methods of support during the next decade.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of the modeled population across health states was compared to reference literature at 12, 26, and 52 weeks. The model verification results are displayed in Supplemental Figures 1 and 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the modeled population across health states was compared to reference literature at 12, 26, and 52 weeks. The model verification results are displayed in Supplemental Figures 1 and 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk‐benefit profile of pediatric VAD implantation varies with multiple factors including age, weight, cardiac diagnoses, and the degree of end‐organ dysfunction . Children with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) have superior survival to those with CHD and children >10 years have superior survival to infants <1 year . Risk stratification by weight is important in younger children.…”
Section: Patient Selection and Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a risk for pulmonary over‐circulation from the RVAD in the pediatric population with an inability to decongest the lungs, resulting in pulmonary edema and hemorrhage. Survival after BiVAD implantation remains inferior to LVAD only, leading to its decreased use by over 50% in the most recent era . There are currently no reliable methods to predict the need for RVAD at the time of LVAD implantation although patient selection and timing of LVAD is likely to play a critical role .…”
Section: Biventricular Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations