Ventricular Coupling of Electrical and Mechanical Dyssynchronization in Heart Failure Patients

Abstract

We studied the relationships of electrical and mechanical synchronization in patients with heart failure (CHF) and various degree of ventricular conduction delays. Ninety-two CHF patients (60 +/- 13 years old, LVEF < 45%), NYHA II-III-IV, and 35 age-matched control subjects were studied with angioscintigraphic phase analysis. We measured ejection fractions (LVEF, RVEF) and calculated the total activation time for the left (TtLV) and right ventricle (TtRV), and the synchronization time between right and left ventricle (TRVLV), and between LV apex and base (Tab). Patients were divided into three groups according to QRS duration: group 1 < 120 ms (n = 28), group 2 < 150 ms (n = 23), group 3 > or = 150 ms (n = 41). In group 1: LVEF = 31.1 +/- 10.9%, RVEF = 30.1 +/- 12.6%, TtLV = 204 +/- 70 ms, TtRV = 183 +/- 61 ms, TRVLV = 7 +/- 33 ms, Tab = 29 +/- 23 ms. In group 2, these were: 27.8 +/- 9.1%, 27.8 +/- 8.8%, 227 +/- 95 ms, 248 +/- 137 ms, 35 +/- 42 ms*, and 39 +/- 53 ms respectively. In group 3: LVEF = 20.5 +/- 9.5%t, RVEF = 28.4 +/- 16.1%, TtLV = 304 +/- 155 mst, TtRV = 234 +/- 106 mst, TRVLV = 64 +/- 42 mst, and Tab = 67 +/- 48 ms*, all P < 0.001 versus controls *P < 0.05 versus G1, tP < or = 0.01 versus G1. A significant relation links QRS to both inter- and intraventricular asynchrony (TRVLV: r = 0.65; TtLL: r = 0.70, Tab: r = 0.60), and to LV function (r = 0.72); while LVEF relates more closely to intraventricular asynchrony: TtLV (r = 0.52), TtLL (r = 0.67), than to interventricular asynchrony: TRVLV (r = 0.48); P < 0.01, P < or = 0.001. In CHF patients, electromechanical and contractile alterations are coupled; regional activation may be an early parameter allowing the detection of ventricular dyssynchronization.

Selective Site Pacing:

“…The concept has been questioned, and although similar correlations between electrical and mechanical parameters have been found in heart failure patients 32 and with resynchronization therapy (CRT), 33,34 there is growing evidence of dissociating electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony at least in dilated failing hearts with and without left bundle branch block 35,36 …”

Left Ventricular Asynchrony in Patients with Right Bundle Branch Block and Normal Ejection Fraction

“…Interventricular conduction block causes nonspecific electrical activation across the ventricles. This sequential activation leads to asynchronous mechanical contraction and relaxation in return …”

“…This sequential activation leads to asynchronous mechanical contraction and relaxation in return. [1][2][3][4] Left intraventricular asynchrony can readily be explained pathophysiologically by the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB), and left intraventricular asynchrony induced by LBBB has been shown to be effectively reduced by biventricular stimulation. 5,6 The role of right bundle branch block (RBBB) for the induction of left intraventricular asynchrony is less clear.…”