2013
DOI: 10.1111/pace.12316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventricular Oversensing after ICD Lead Replacement: What Is the Mechanism?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanical interaction between 2 endocardial leads [88][89][90] or a lead and a retained fragment 91 is a rare cause of oversensing that is usually suggested by the proximity of 2 leads on imaging. The few reports show substantial variation in signal morphology, mostly transient, intermediate-frequency signals.…”
Section: Lead-lead Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical interaction between 2 endocardial leads [88][89][90] or a lead and a retained fragment 91 is a rare cause of oversensing that is usually suggested by the proximity of 2 leads on imaging. The few reports show substantial variation in signal morphology, mostly transient, intermediate-frequency signals.…”
Section: Lead-lead Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the lead and the graft were spared from damage during traditional implant, it was theorized that oversensing or “chatter” might occur owing to the metallic skeleton of the HeRO graft. As demonstrated by a limited number of cases where abandoned electrodes cause interference with new devices, nearby metal need not be carrying current to interfere with new ICD leads 7, 8. As a result, placement in the substernal location was warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%