1943
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1943.00210020003001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventricular Tachycardia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1944
1944
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DIscuSSION The special chest leads used in this study often display larger auricular waves than the standard leads, and thus help the interpretation of records showing abnormal rhythms. Auricular lead F appears to be superior to auricular lead R. Though Wood and Selzer (1939) stated that the right arm was the better distal electrode for the study of auricular activity, it is open to question whether their results can be directly compared with ours because they used a different technique, placing the exploring electrode in the fourth intercostal space at the right sternal border (leads CR1 and CF1). In ten unselected cases we studied the P waves in both auricular leads R and F, and in leads CR1 and CFI; the comparative figures are shown in Table I.…”
Section: Sinus Rhythmmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DIscuSSION The special chest leads used in this study often display larger auricular waves than the standard leads, and thus help the interpretation of records showing abnormal rhythms. Auricular lead F appears to be superior to auricular lead R. Though Wood and Selzer (1939) stated that the right arm was the better distal electrode for the study of auricular activity, it is open to question whether their results can be directly compared with ours because they used a different technique, placing the exploring electrode in the fourth intercostal space at the right sternal border (leads CR1 and CF1). In ten unselected cases we studied the P waves in both auricular leads R and F, and in leads CR1 and CFI; the comparative figures are shown in Table I.…”
Section: Sinus Rhythmmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…He failed to notice any close relationship between the size of the right auricle and the amplitude of the P waves. Williams and Ellis (1943) used special auricular precordial leads in their study of ventricular tachycardia: they placed the exploring electrode in the third intercostal space at the right sternal border, using first the right arm and then the left leg for the indifferent electrode; they stated that these leads have repeatedly clarified an otherwise doubtful diagnosis. Barker et al (1943) suggested that in cases in which the P waves are small or indistinct in the standard leads, chest leads might prove helpful; in their opinion, by leading from two precordial contacts, one over the upper part of the sternum and the other over the ensiform process, it is usually possible to record large auricular waves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of taking special chest leads was that adopted by Schoenewald (1939), Faulkner (1943, and Williams and Ellis (1943). A circular electrode, 1 8 cm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He failed to notice any close relationship between the size of the right auricle and the amplitude of the P waves. Williams and Ellis (1943) used special auricular precordial leads in their study of ventricular tachycardia: they placed the exploring electrode in the third intercostal space at the right sternal border, using first the right arm and then the left leg for the indifferent electrode; they stated that these leads have repeatedly clarified an otherwise doubtful diagnosis. Barker et al (1943) suggested that in cases in which the P waves are small or indistinct in the standard leads, chest leads might prove helpful; in their opinion, by leading from two precordial contacts, one over the upper part of the sternum and the other over the ensiform process, it is usually possible to record large auricular waves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%