2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2018.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
219
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
6
219
1
Order By: Relevance
“…with range being similar for pediatric patents. 1,4,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14] This is in par with our study results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…with range being similar for pediatric patents. 1,4,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14] This is in par with our study results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…17 Though with no touch technique our shunt infection rate stands at 8%, it is still lower compared to that reported in other series. 1,4,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14] The fact that the change of gloves before handing the shunt has been shown to be a simple and cost effective way to reduce postoperative shunt infections also stands in support of no touch techniqe. 18 Glove holes during shunt handling has been cited as a signifi cant risk factor for shunt infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A common complication is a subsequent blockage which usually presents with symptoms attributable to the recurrence of hydrocephalus. The ventricular catheter or valve is the most common site of blockage and can be caused by debris such as blood or excess protein in the CSF [1]. Additionally, ventricular catheter blockage may be caused by choroid plexus becoming entangled in and obstructing the perforations at the tip of the ventricular catheter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%