2012
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2012.693584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS)

Abstract: Background Verbs and sentences are often impaired in individuals with aphasia, and differential impairment patterns are associated with different types of aphasia. With currently available test batteries, however, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive profile of aphasic language impairments because they do not examine syntactically important properties of verbs and sentences. Aims This study presents data derived from the Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS; Thompson, 2011), a new tes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
98
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
14
98
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The database contains video samples of discourse in four genres (personal narrative, picture description, story re-telling, and procedural discourse) obtained using a standardised protocol. In addition, the results of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) Aphasia Quotient (Kertesz, 2007), short form Boston Naming Test (BNT) (Kaplan, Goodglass, & Weintraub, 2001), Verb Naming Test (VNT) (Cho-Reyes & Thompson, 2012), and the Aphasia Bank repetition test are included for almost all individuals with aphasia. Extensive demographic data is also reported, including gender, age, race, handedness, education, occupation, aphasia etiology and duration, aphasia type, site of lesion, mood, and history of communication disorders.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The database contains video samples of discourse in four genres (personal narrative, picture description, story re-telling, and procedural discourse) obtained using a standardised protocol. In addition, the results of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) Aphasia Quotient (Kertesz, 2007), short form Boston Naming Test (BNT) (Kaplan, Goodglass, & Weintraub, 2001), Verb Naming Test (VNT) (Cho-Reyes & Thompson, 2012), and the Aphasia Bank repetition test are included for almost all individuals with aphasia. Extensive demographic data is also reported, including gender, age, race, handedness, education, occupation, aphasia etiology and duration, aphasia type, site of lesion, mood, and history of communication disorders.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of these findings, selected supplemental tests are administered at the discretion of the examining SLP. These include, but are not limited to, the Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia (PALPA; Kay, Lesser, & Coltheart, 1992), Pyramids and Palm Trees (Howard & Patterson, 1992), the Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS; Cho-Reyes & Thompson, 2012), and the Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT; Roach, Schwartz, & Martin, 1996). These supplemental assessments are administered to provide additional information regarding the nature and locus of linguistic processing deficits identified by the CAT and to guide the development of individualized treatment plans.…”
Section: Clinical Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sentences were randomized before being presented to participants. The experimental materials used in the present study include forty pictures from the Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (Choreyes& Thompson, 2012) coupled with fifty pictures used in other research which is irrelevant to the purpose of this experiment. A sample stimulus is presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%