2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2007.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal dichotic listening performance and its relationship with EEG features in benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
27
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the EEG, the number of RS had no significant correlation with performance in the DWPT, in agreement with various other authors who evaluated memory and language aspects, such as phonological consciousness 10,19,27 . RS in the left hemisphere could eventually cause interference in the hemispheric specialization of language processing and phonemic fluency 12,19 , but in the present study, the side of the RS was not associated with differences in performance in the DWPT, and also had no relationship with performance in other neuropsychological evaluations 1,10,11 .…”
Section: Dwpt and Aspects Of Epilepsy And Rssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With respect to the EEG, the number of RS had no significant correlation with performance in the DWPT, in agreement with various other authors who evaluated memory and language aspects, such as phonological consciousness 10,19,27 . RS in the left hemisphere could eventually cause interference in the hemispheric specialization of language processing and phonemic fluency 12,19 , but in the present study, the side of the RS was not associated with differences in performance in the DWPT, and also had no relationship with performance in other neuropsychological evaluations 1,10,11 .…”
Section: Dwpt and Aspects Of Epilepsy And Rssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The inferior performance observed for the children in the DWPT in this study, could be related to the processing difficulties indicated by Northcott et al 10 and Bulgheroni et al, 27 .…”
Section: Dwpt and Bcectsmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Riva et al (2007) found that children with a left-sided spike focus scored significantly worse than controls on phonemic fluency, while children with a rightsided spike focus scored significantly worse than controls in the Vocabulary subtest of the WISC-R and in the lexical comprehension test. Bulgheroni et al (2008) found no specific influence of the side of the interictal spikes on DL performance. Correlating the topography of the focus (in terms of the hemispheric localization and the side) with neuropsychological impairments is particularly difficult in BECTS, because spike location varies as the disorder evolves (Pinton et al, 2006) and there are reports of bilateral oscillations for the lateralized time-domain spike, suggesting a synchronized activity in a network of bilateral rolandic neurons (Lin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Relationship Between Neuropsychological Data and Clinical Fementioning
confidence: 77%
“…Northcott et al (2005) found no correlation between spike burden and difficulties in memory or phonological awareness, while Weglage et al (1997) quantified spike frequency but did not correlate this with specific neuropsychological and language functions. Using a semiquantitative measure of spikes in EEGs recorded while awake, Staden et al (1998) found a trend towards higher language dysfunction rates with more frequent epileptogenic discharges, whereas Bulgheroni et al (2008) found no significant link between DL performance and interictal discharge rate, suggesting that cortical dysfunctional states depend on protracted periods of hyper-excitability leading to centrotemporal spikes, rather than on the time course (and quantity) of the spikes at the time of the DL test. It might be argued that the lack of any correlation between spike rate and neuropsychological data is due to the interval between the EEG recording on which the interictal spike rate was calculated and the neuropsychological assessment being too long to enable a detailed correlation analysis between the electrophysiological and cognitive measures, but Wolff et al (2005) conducted a combined EEG/MEG examination chronologically very close to the neuropsychological assessment and still found no correlation between the number of spikes and the cognitive results.…”
Section: Relationship Between Neuropsychological Data and Clinical Fementioning
confidence: 99%