Verbal Expression of Preparedness in Retirement Planning Interviews

Abstract

Conceptualization of retirement requires interdisciplinary research, which is represented by psycholinguistic approach in the present paper. The study takes a first step to explore conceptualization of retirement by individuals with different levels of retirement preparedness. The study applies questionnaire Psychological Preparedness for Retirement (Zasiekina & Mahdysiuk, 2018) to assess levels of preparedness; semi-structured interviews to focus primarily on concerns related to planning postretirement period; Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) (Tausczik & Pennebaker, 2010) to reveal psychological categories and explore conceptualization of retirement. By the end of the assessment, data had been collected from 117 workers who were at preretirement period. The sample was weighted by age and occupation in order to improve its representative of the total population 22 (18.8%) – university staff, teachers at colleges, 18 (15.4%), nurses in kindergartens, 8 (6.6%), healthcare staff, 18 (15.4%), government officials, 28 (23.9%), workers from private sector, 23 (19.7%). The final weighted sample includes 65.8% females, average age 54.52, (SD=6.21). The results indicate that 8.5% respondents have a low level of preparedness, 61.5% - a medium level of preparedness and 30% - a high level of preparedness. Interestingly, the highest percentage of categories of affect and positive emotions were observed in the group with a medium level of preparedness, whereas the highest percentage of categories cause, focus on present, and family were captured in the group with a high level of preparedness. Taken together, these results suggest that the high level of retirement preparedness is associated with active cognitive reappraisal of retirement as a period of family activities.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Retirement Planning Tools: A Study on Financial Illiteracy and Retirement Preparedness

“…Strategies for reducing the impact of exponential growth bias include increasing awareness of the cost of waiting to save and showing the benefits of starting the savings and investing journey early. In a study by Mahdysiuk et al (2020), participants completed a psychological preparedness for retirement questionnaire, which revealed the highest positive emotions among participants with medium levels of preparedness and lower positive emotions among those with high preparedness. This finding may be attributed to heightened awareness, anxiety over the future, and more active appraisal for their preparedness for the future.…”