2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal fluency in adults with high functioning autism or Asperger syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
64
5
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
64
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6,8 Others take an opposite stance. Asperger syndrome and autism present with distinct verbal styles, [18][19][20] motor signs, 21 emotion perception 22 and pragmatic reasoning. 23 There are critical differences in processing strategies adopted by individuals with Asperger syndrome and those with autism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6,8 Others take an opposite stance. Asperger syndrome and autism present with distinct verbal styles, [18][19][20] motor signs, 21 emotion perception 22 and pragmatic reasoning. 23 There are critical differences in processing strategies adopted by individuals with Asperger syndrome and those with autism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are exceptions to this positive description. Even as adults, people with ASD are slower than age- and IQ-matched peers at identifying atypical category members (Gastgeb, et al, 2006), and they generate fewer exemplars in semantic fluency tasks (e.g., name all the animals you can think of within 1 min) than unaffected adults with similar levels of language comprehension (Spek, Schatorjé, Scholte, & van Berckelaer-Onnes, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We decided to use a single letter “F” in order to minimize the amount of testing time and based on reports in the literature that results obtained with letter “F” tend to be similar to those obtained with 3-letter combinations (Ruff et al, 1996; Tombaugh, Kozak, & Rees, 1999) and thus is frequently used in clinical settings as a bedside test (Lezak et al, 2004). While this pilot study was not designed to assess concurrent and predictive validity of SVF and PVF testing, these tests have been well established and widely used for assessment of cognitive function in populations affected by neurodegenerative disease, traumatic brain injury, developmental disorders, and drug toxicity (Burgess et al, 1998; Doesborgh et al, 2002; Henry & Crawford, 2004a, 2004b, 2004c, 2005; Henry et al, 2004, 2005; Marino et al, 2012; Spek et al, 2009; Witt et al, 2013). Future studies are needed to assess the concurrent and predictive validity of VF testing in the context of cognitive effects of smoking and nicotine withdrawal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Word retrieval on both PVF and SVF tests relies on both frontal and temporal cognitive mechanisms; however, PVF relies more heavily on frontal function (working memory, inhibition of inappropriate responses and sustained attention) than SVF, and SVF relies more heavily on temporal function (semantic memory) than PVF. PVF and SVF tests have been widely used in neurological, psychiatric, mental health, and school settings and their construct and ecological validity have been extensively demonstrated (Burgess et al, 1998; Doesborgh et al, 2002; Henry & Crawford, 2004a, 2004b, 2004c, 2005; Henry, Crawford, & Phillips, 2004, 2005; Marino et al, 2012; Spek, Schatorje, Scholte, & van Berckelaer-Onnes, 2009; Witt, Elger, & Helmstaedter, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%