2021
DOI: 10.20935/al1493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal Guise Test: Problems and Solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most distinctive difference between VGT and MGT is that VGT uses different speakers instead of one bilingual or multilingual speaker to produce the recordings [1]. Because VGT allows speakers to use their first language, thus the unnaturalness issue can be overcome [5].…”
Section: Language Attitude Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most distinctive difference between VGT and MGT is that VGT uses different speakers instead of one bilingual or multilingual speaker to produce the recordings [1]. Because VGT allows speakers to use their first language, thus the unnaturalness issue can be overcome [5].…”
Section: Language Attitude Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VGT is a modification of the classic MGT (matched guise technique) in that it uses multiple speakers to provide sound recordings of either read or spontaneous speech instead of only one bilingual speaker usually reading a prepared text in their native varieties. Although VGT has received some criticism (see Chan 2021), it has made its way into modern studies on World Englishes and attitudes towards them. For our study we employed six different speakers reading the same text in their native English variety.…”
Section: Instruments and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%