Verbal Instruction Reduces Patellofemoral Joint Loading During Bodyweight Squatting

Abstract

Context: The bodyweight squat exercise is a common component for treatment and prevention of patellofemoral pain; however, it can also place a high load on the patellofemoral joint. Restricting anterior motion of the knees relative to the toes during squatting appears to reduce patellofemoral loading. However, exercise professionals typically rely on verbal instructions to alter squat technique. Objective: To evaluate the influence of verbal instructions regarding squat technique on patellofemoral joint loading. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Motion analysis laboratory. Participants: Eleven uninjured females. Intervention: Participants performed bodyweight squats before (baseline) and after receiving verbal instructions to limit anterior knee motion. Two different types of verbal instruction were used, one intended to promote an internal focus of attention and the other intended to promote an external focus of attention. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were recorded using a multicamera system and force plate. Main Outcome Measures: Sagittal plane patellofemoral joint forces and stress were estimated using a musculoskeletal model. Results: Participants demonstrated a reduction in patellofemoral joint forces (35.4 vs 31.3 N/kg; P = .01) and stress (10.7 vs 9.2 mPa; P = .002) after receiving instructions promoting an internal focus of attention, compared with their baseline trials. Participants also demonstrated a reduction in patellofemoral joint forces (35.4 vs 32.3 N/kg; P = .03) and stress (10.7 vs 9.6 mPa; P = .04) after receiving instructions promoting an external focus of attention (vs baseline). However, there were no significant differences in patellofemoral forces (P = .84) or stress (P = .41) for trials performed with an internal versus external attentional focus. Conclusion: It appears that verbal instruction regarding knee position influences patellofemoral joint loading during squatting.

The Recovery of Weight-Bearing Symmetry After Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Activity-Dependent

“…Both standing tests had different instructions and lead to different results. This indicates that the verbal instruction and the attempt to load evenly influence both the ipsilateral loading and WBS, which supports findings on this topic found in other populations and activities ( Milner et al, 2012 ; Almonroeder et al, 2020 ). This analysis only focused on two aspects of performance (i.e., ipsilateral loading and WBS) and is possible that there were differences across the tests that were not investigated as part of this study, such as those referring to muscle activity ( Lohse and Sherwood, 2012 ; Coratella et al, 2020 ).…”

May the force be with you: understanding how patellofemoral joint reaction force compares across different activities and physical interventions—a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…The full text of 227 studies was retrieved and screened (figure 2). In total, 71 articles were included in the systematic review 25–95. There were 63 within-subject studies (56 healthy individuals, 7 patellofemoral pain), 1 randomised controlled trial in healthy individuals (online supplemental table 2) and…”

Patellofemoral Joint Loading during the Performance of the Wall Squat and Ball Squat with Heel-to-Wall-Distance Variations

“…Wallace et al (9) reported peak patellofemoral joint force and stress magnitudes of approximately 1700 N (also similar to our force magnitudes) and 9.3 MPa (2–3 times greater than our magnitudes), respectively, during the bodyweight squat at 90° knee angle. Almonroeder et al (10) reported a mean patellofemoral joint force and stress magnitudes of approximately 2300 N and 11 MPa, respectively, while performing the bodyweight squat.…”