1994
DOI: 10.1037/0090-5550.39.4.263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal interactions with individuals presenting with and without physical disability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of patronizing speech have shown that students use much higher‐pitched voices when speaking to adults assumed to be disabled compared to adults without disabilities (Liesener & Mills, ). Similar infantilizing, repetitive speech patterns have been observed on college campuses (Gouvier, Coon, Todd, & Fuller, ), and among medical students when interacting with visibly impaired others (Eddey, Robey, & McConnell, ). Furthermore, people with disabilities consistently report being the targets of unsolicited, inappropriate, and unwanted assistance for which they are expected to be grateful (Braithwaite & Eckstein, ).…”
Section: Hostile Ableism Researchsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Studies of patronizing speech have shown that students use much higher‐pitched voices when speaking to adults assumed to be disabled compared to adults without disabilities (Liesener & Mills, ). Similar infantilizing, repetitive speech patterns have been observed on college campuses (Gouvier, Coon, Todd, & Fuller, ), and among medical students when interacting with visibly impaired others (Eddey, Robey, & McConnell, ). Furthermore, people with disabilities consistently report being the targets of unsolicited, inappropriate, and unwanted assistance for which they are expected to be grateful (Braithwaite & Eckstein, ).…”
Section: Hostile Ableism Researchsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…1998; Goffman, 1963;Jones, Farina, Hastorf, Markus, Miller, & Scott, 1984). Par exemple, Gouvier et al (1994) ont montré que les étudiants valides utilisaient le langage adressé aux enfants (LAE) lorsqu'ils répondaient à un pair en fauteuil roulant qui demandait le chemin de la bibliothèque universitaire, mais s'exprimaient tout à fait "normalement" avec un pair valide. Le contexte universitaire dans lequel se déroulait cette étude s'avère particulièrement intéressant pour plusieurs raisons.…”
Section: La Théorie De La Privation Relative Et Les Réactions Au Handunclassified
“…Si les attitudes et comportements envers les personnes handicapées ne sont pas unilatéralement négatifs (Katz & Glass, 1979;Sheehan, Boisvert, Pépin, & Fougeyrollas, 1995), une constante malheureuse des relations intergroupes se trouve être, dans son plus large terme, le préjudice. De la "simple" façon de s'adresser verbalement aux personnes handicapées (Gouvier, Coon, Todd, & Fuller, 1994) à l'eugénisme (Pfeiffer, 1994), nous retrouvons tout un pan de situations incluant des pensées, affects et comportements semblant s'appliquer à n'importe quelle minorité. Ainsi, étant données la permanence et la répétition de ces situations dévalorisantes, nous pouvons nous interroger quant aux réactions des membres des groupes concernés: est-il possible que dans de telles conditions, l'image de soi ne soit pas dégradée?…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…This assumption was informed by previous research demonstrating that people with disabilities are often treated like helpless children. For example, when asking for directions on a college campus, confederates using a wheelchair received more concrete, redundant answers than did their nondisabled counterparts (Gouvier, Coon, Todd, & Fuller, ). Similarly, college students gave directions that resembled those they would give to a 12‐year‐old child (e.g., using more words, speaking louder and in a higher pitched voice) when under the impression that the recipient was an adult using a wheelchair, even when the adult was clearly identified as a working professional (Liesener & Mills, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%