2009
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awp012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal memory in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: beyond material specificity

Abstract: The idea that verbal and non-verbal forms of memory are segregated in their entirety, and localized to the left and right hippocampi, is arguably the most influential concept in the neuropsychology of temporal lobe epilepsy, forming a cornerstone of pre-surgical decision making, and a frame for interpreting postoperative outcome. This critical review begins by examining some of the unexpressed but inescapable assumptions of the material-specificity model: (i) verbal and non-verbal memory are unitary and intern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

27
211
4
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
27
211
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…A major reason for this approach is that systematic effects of surgery are mostly found only for verbal memory after left temporal lobe surgery. 42,44,48 However, left and right mesial structures appear to provide highly redundant and compensatory functions in verbal memory processing. 17 Accordingly, it can be observed that nonverbal memory may be sacrificed in favor of verbal memory 20 and that material-specific impairments in TLE are less likely in the presence of generally reduced mental capacities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major reason for this approach is that systematic effects of surgery are mostly found only for verbal memory after left temporal lobe surgery. 42,44,48 However, left and right mesial structures appear to provide highly redundant and compensatory functions in verbal memory processing. 17 Accordingly, it can be observed that nonverbal memory may be sacrificed in favor of verbal memory 20 and that material-specific impairments in TLE are less likely in the presence of generally reduced mental capacities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sparing lateral temporal cortex may preserve connections involved in contextual learning of information based on semantic content and syntactical structure [29]. However, we expect that ablating mesial temporal lobe structures (hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus) will result in decline in noncontextual memory, such as learning of unrelated series or pairs of words [28,29]. We should note that we have treated patients not yet reported in the literature who did experience verbal memory impairment after SLAH.…”
Section: Mtlementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Decline in verbal memory is associated with dominant hemisphere resections [28]. Sparing lateral temporal cortex may preserve connections involved in contextual learning of information based on semantic content and syntactical structure [29]. However, we expect that ablating mesial temporal lobe structures (hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus) will result in decline in noncontextual memory, such as learning of unrelated series or pairs of words [28,29].…”
Section: Mtlementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, the finally included verbal episodic memory tasks primarily required processing of semantically related verbal information. Indeed, associative memory processes seem to contribute little to performance in episodic memory tasks with semantically related verbal information such as texts or word lists (see Saling, 2009), with several studies reporting reduced or even nonexisting performance decrements in older adults for semantically related in comparison to unrelated word pairs (e.g., Badham, Estes, & Maylor, 2012;Naveh-Benjamin, Craik, Guez, & Kreuger, 2005;Patterson, Light, Van Ocker, & Olfman, 2009 Second, because the correct retrieval of object-location associations depends on the retention of both objects and locations in memory (Postma et al, 2008), OLM training practices also memory for objects and memory for locations alongside associative memory.…”
Section: Transfer Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%