2002
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening.

Abstract: Three studies investigated whether and under what conditions the addition of on-screen text would facilitate the learning of a narrated scientific multimedia explanation. Students were presented with an explanation about the process of lightning formation in the auditory alone (nonredundant) or auditory and visual (redundant) modalities. In Experiment 1, the effects of preceding the nonredundant or redundant explanation with a corresponding animation were examined. In Experiment 2, the effects of presenting th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
215
8
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
20
215
8
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, according to the cognitive theory of multimedia learning, adding on-screen text can create extraneous processing because the learner tries to reconcile the two incoming verbal streams and must scan between the text at the bottom of the screen and the relevant portion of the animation. As predicted, in 5 out of 5 experiments, involving computerbased lessons on lightning and environmental science, people who received animation and narration performed better on a transfer test than people who received animation, narration, and on-screen text , Experiments 1 and 2; Moreno & Mayer, 2002a, Experiment 2; Moreno & Mayer, 2002b, Experiments 2a and 2b). The median effect size was 0.72, which is a medium effect.…”
Section: Five Principles For Reducing Extraneous Processingsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, according to the cognitive theory of multimedia learning, adding on-screen text can create extraneous processing because the learner tries to reconcile the two incoming verbal streams and must scan between the text at the bottom of the screen and the relevant portion of the animation. As predicted, in 5 out of 5 experiments, involving computerbased lessons on lightning and environmental science, people who received animation and narration performed better on a transfer test than people who received animation, narration, and on-screen text , Experiments 1 and 2; Moreno & Mayer, 2002a, Experiment 2; Moreno & Mayer, 2002b, Experiments 2a and 2b). The median effect size was 0.72, which is a medium effect.…”
Section: Five Principles For Reducing Extraneous Processingsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In three separate experiments involving multimedia explanations of lightning (Mayer, Heiser, & Lonn, 2001, Experiments 1 and 2; Moreno & Mayer, 2002b, Experiment 2), students who received animation and narration performed better on transfer tests than did students who received animation, narration, and on-screen text. We refer to this pattern as the redundancy effect.…”
Section: Redundancy Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Redundancy Principle suggests improving multimedia presentation by presenting animation along with concurrent recitation and on-screen text (Moreno, R. & Mayer, 2002). To allow the students to choose the format that goes well with their learning style, the above principle suggests presenting the same words in two formats (Kalyuga, Chandler, & Sweller, 1999;Mayer, 2005).…”
Section: Redundancy Principlementioning
confidence: 99%