2016
DOI: 10.7189/jogh.06.010604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal/social autopsy study helps explain the lack of decrease in neonatal mortality in Niger, 2007–2010

Abstract: BackgroundThis study was one of a set of verbal/social autopsy (VASA) investigations undertaken by the WHO/UNICEF–supported Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group to estimate the causes and determinants of neonatal and child deaths in high priority countries. The study objective was to help explain the lack of decrease in neonatal mortality in Niger from 2007 to 2010, a period during which child mortality was decreasing.MethodsVASA interviews were conducted of a random sample of 453 neonatal deaths identifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in Uganda [11], 96% of respondents recognized severe symptoms in their children under the age of 5 before death, but a third were treated at home before going to a facility. Similarly, in Niger [12], while 95.8% of pregnant women’s caregivers reported a serious or severe symptom prior to death, 60.3% of women received no care for their illness. In Malawi, 97.8% of caretakers recognized a severe or possibly severe symptom, but only 61.1% sought or tried to seek care [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in Uganda [11], 96% of respondents recognized severe symptoms in their children under the age of 5 before death, but a third were treated at home before going to a facility. Similarly, in Niger [12], while 95.8% of pregnant women’s caregivers reported a serious or severe symptom prior to death, 60.3% of women received no care for their illness. In Malawi, 97.8% of caretakers recognized a severe or possibly severe symptom, but only 61.1% sought or tried to seek care [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twelve of the 16 studies provided glimpses into some of the other reasons families may not be seeking prompt attention. These included perceived low quality of care at the facility [6,9,17,21], attributing illness to spiritual and other non-medical causes [6,8,18,19], thinking that the baby would die anyway or was too sick to travel [12,14], thinking that the baby was not sick enough to seek care [14], not having a family member to accompany the woman to the facility [12,20], and needing husband’s permission to seek care [8]. Specific examples of how such barriers influence care include that in Bangladesh, 18% of mothers said they did not bring the baby for care because they thought it would die anyway [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, VASA, an integrated approach, whereby VA is merged with SA to identify not only the medical causes of mortalities but also to identify the social contributors of child deaths. This integrated tool is under trial in some of the low resource settings across the globe (4,(6)(7)(8)(9). Literature suggests that CHERG (Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group) VASA integrated tool, which is based on the so-far most holistic conceptual framework, i.e., "The Pathway to Survival Conceptual Framework" (TPtoSCF) (10), have been utilized in several countries (6,7,9,11) for exploring the most relevant medical and social determinants of mortality events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information ultimately helps the epidemiologists in assigning the medical and social causes to child deaths. The extensive data obtained from VASA tool based investigations provides highly elaborated evidence and information on extended determinants of child mortality which is of great public health importance (4,6,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach can give extended data on most relevant biological and social determinants related to specific death event and ultimately help in assigning a broader cause of death. However, the literature shows that such investigations have been undertaken by either way; administering VA and SA tools separately (but in synergy) for each death event [28][29][30][31] or using an integrated tool where SA is merged with VA, thereby making a single tool for recording data on biological and social determinants 8, [21][22][23][24][25][26][32][33][34][35] . However, logically, the single integrated tool should be based on an integrated CF that should be holistic in recording biological and social determinants of child mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%