2020
DOI: 10.1177/0142723719900739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal working memory resources and comprehension of relative clauses in children with cochlear implants

Abstract: Verbal working memory resources may impact syntax comprehension. Thirteen Italian children with cochlear implants (CIs) were assessed in relative clause (RC) comprehension, digit span and nonword repetition and compared to 13 chronological age peers (CA) and 13 younger controls (LA) with normal hearing (NH). The RC comprehension task tested subject relatives (SR), object relatives with preverbal (OR) and postverbal subjects (ORp) where number features were manipulated. Children with CIs show worse performance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally yet importantly, the results of the present study add to the growing literature on the language abilities of Italian-speaking deaf children with CIs (Volpato 2011;Caselli et al, 2012;Rinaldi, Baruffaldi, Burdo, and Caselli, 2013;Guasti et al, 2014;Volpato and Vernice, 2014;Murri, Cuda, Guerzoni, and Fabrizi, 2015;D'Ortenzio and Volpato, 2019;Giustolisi et al, 2019;Volpato, 2020). As discussed by Guasti et al (2014), language typology is a key factor in language development; therefore, it is important to provide detailed descriptions of the linguistic behaviors of children with CIs speaking languages other than English, for which the amount of literature is very sparse compared to that on English-speaking children with CIs (for a review, see Nittrouer and Caldwell-Tarr, 2016) Table 5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Finally yet importantly, the results of the present study add to the growing literature on the language abilities of Italian-speaking deaf children with CIs (Volpato 2011;Caselli et al, 2012;Rinaldi, Baruffaldi, Burdo, and Caselli, 2013;Guasti et al, 2014;Volpato and Vernice, 2014;Murri, Cuda, Guerzoni, and Fabrizi, 2015;D'Ortenzio and Volpato, 2019;Giustolisi et al, 2019;Volpato, 2020). As discussed by Guasti et al (2014), language typology is a key factor in language development; therefore, it is important to provide detailed descriptions of the linguistic behaviors of children with CIs speaking languages other than English, for which the amount of literature is very sparse compared to that on English-speaking children with CIs (for a review, see Nittrouer and Caldwell-Tarr, 2016) Table 5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Eleven studies could be included in this systematic review (Akçakaya et al, 2019;Hall et al, 2018;López-Higes et al, 2015;Schouwenaars et al, 2019;Torkildsen et al, 2018;Volpato, 2020). Only six of them had the comparison of cognitive skills as their focus (Akçakaya et al, 2019;Engel-Yeger et al, 2011;Hall et al, 2018;Torkildsen et al, 2018;Volpato, 2020;Yucel & Derim, 2008). There is a lack of research on the cognitive abilities of school-aged children with CI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study looks at the language of children with Down Syndrome (Penke & Wimmer, 2020). The final study by Volpato (2020) examines the language of children who had not been exposed to language at birth: these are deaf children fitted with a cochlear implant. Not only a wide range of conditions but also a variety of languages are considered: Russian-Hebrew (bilingual and monolingual children with HFA), Albanian/Russian–Greek, different L1–French (bilingual and monolingual children with DLD), English (children with SLD), German (children with Down Syndrome), and Italian (children fitted with CI).…”
Section: Some Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%