1997
DOI: 10.1038/38496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception

Abstract: Primates use vergence eye movements to align their two eyes on the same object and can correct misalignments by sensing the difference in the positions of the two retinal images of the object (binocular disparity). When large random-dot patterns are viewed dichoptically and small binocular misalignments are suddenly imposed (disparity steps), corrective vergence eye movements are elicited at ultrashort latencies. Here we show that the same steps applied to dense anticorrelated patterns, in which each black dot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
149
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
149
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many neurons manifest disparity selectivity when stimulated with anticorrelated RDSs (Cumming and Parker 1997). Also, anticorrelated images induce transient vergence eye movements in the opposite direction than correlated images (Masson et al 1997 One could argue that the impossibility to see any depth in stimulus (ÀA, A), (A, ÀA) for any combination of presentation time T ÀA, A and T A, ÀA , was not caused by the absence of delay mechanisms but by the fact that, in monocular viewing, the continuous alternations of anticorrelated images might have a detrimental effect on stereopsis. This alternative explanation was tested in experiment 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many neurons manifest disparity selectivity when stimulated with anticorrelated RDSs (Cumming and Parker 1997). Also, anticorrelated images induce transient vergence eye movements in the opposite direction than correlated images (Masson et al 1997 One could argue that the impossibility to see any depth in stimulus (ÀA, A), (A, ÀA) for any combination of presentation time T ÀA, A and T A, ÀA , was not caused by the absence of delay mechanisms but by the fact that, in monocular viewing, the continuous alternations of anticorrelated images might have a detrimental effect on stereopsis. This alternative explanation was tested in experiment 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A peak in the cross-correlation of the left and right eye images computed by the neuron can signal the average depth of the surfaces within the RF. This local disparity signal may support coarse stereopsis (Tyler, 1990), as well as vergence eye movement (Masson et al, 1997;Takemura et al, 2001).…”
Section: Neural Correlates Of Stereoscopic Depth Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting depth-vergence curves can be qualitatively related to the initial vergence responses to disparity steps in humans and monkeys (Masson et al 1997;Takemura et al 2001) (see inset in Fig. 7a).…”
Section: Experiments 3: Invariance To Luminance Texture and Interocumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the camera axes are moving freely, as it occurs in a binocular active vision system, stereopsis cannot longer be considered a 1D problem and both horizontal and vertical disparities are primary cues to drive vergence movements (Cumming and Parker 1997;Masson et al 1997;Takemura et al 2001). Therefore, as anticipated above, the 1D phase difference approach must be extended to the 2D case.…”
Section: Bio-inspired Vergence Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation