2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/rew.2016.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verifiable Limited Disclosure: Reporting and Handling Digital Evidence in Police Investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also show that snap forensics may be made more privacy-friendly by a careful design of the mechanism. Currently we are working with UK Police to implement part of the solution on social-lift.com, a platform to support snap forensics by limiting the verifiable and selective disclosure of users' personal information on social media [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also show that snap forensics may be made more privacy-friendly by a careful design of the mechanism. Currently we are working with UK Police to implement part of the solution on social-lift.com, a platform to support snap forensics by limiting the verifiable and selective disclosure of users' personal information on social media [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that some inequalities are necessary for the functioning of the social system [17], however, it is necessary for the police to update their progress regularly and keep citizens in the loop, which also increases transparency and trust [63]. We suggest that digital evidence collection with limited disclosure [55] could protect users' privacy as well as support building digital trust between citizens and the police.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The 'verifiable limited disclosure' [3] protocol meets the first three criteria. Here we propose a modified approach, which is proactive, collects the evidence for a crime committed in social media.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%