2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification and analysis of domain-specific models of physical characteristics in embedded control software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other algorithms are to learn action models with incomplete state information [2,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], which means preconditions and effects can be learned when the state information before and after each action is not fully observed. Yang et al, [17] build an action model learning system-ARMS by using SAT, which can handle the case with incomplete state information, and acquire STRIPS action models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other algorithms are to learn action models with incomplete state information [2,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], which means preconditions and effects can be learned when the state information before and after each action is not fully observed. Yang et al, [17] build an action model learning system-ARMS by using SAT, which can handle the case with incomplete state information, and acquire STRIPS action models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect and cope with defects at runtime, the behavior of the software and the system needs to be observed. Monitoring the behavior of the software and the system at runtime to detect defects is called runtime 1 Part of the content in this chapter is based on a paper published at the 5th International Conference on Secure Software Integration and Reliability Improvement, SSIRI 2011 [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%