2008
DOI: 10.13182/nse160-129tn
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification and Determination of the Decay Heat in Spent PWR Fuel by Means of Gamma Scanning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the residual heat and burnup [1] and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) must be assured that the information on the nuclear material is correct before the encapsulation since it will not be easily accessible afterwards [2]. At present, the IAEA has identified a need for new measuring techniques [3], e.g.…”
Section: Verification Of Fuel Assemblies' Completenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the residual heat and burnup [1] and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) must be assured that the information on the nuclear material is correct before the encapsulation since it will not be easily accessible afterwards [2]. At present, the IAEA has identified a need for new measuring techniques [3], e.g.…”
Section: Verification Of Fuel Assemblies' Completenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burn-up 1.2% to 4% Willman et al (2006), Osifo et al (2008), Guardini (2004) Cooling Time 1.5% to 4% Willman et al (2006), Osifo et al (2008), Guardini (2004) Decay heat 2% to 3% Simpson et al (2008), Jansson (2002), Osifo et al (2008) Initial enrichment <1% (~25% of 235 U content) Min et al (1988) From a Clink planning perspective it is important to keep in mind the need for calibration of the passive gamma and gamma tomography methods to be able to determine decay heat. The calibration procedure includes both calorimetric measurements, of which some have been performed already, and measurements with passive gamma or gamma tomography in the measurement geometry to be used at the facility.…”
Section: Parameter Uncertainty Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%