2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification and validation of an intelligent tutorial system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criteria are usually interpreted by some statistical measurement which is belonging to quantitative evaluation methods. Based on [3], statistical measures are separated into three classes: pair measurement, group measurement and agreement ratios, so the validation criteria will be explained in such way too Pair measurement is done by constructed the contingency table of all possible pair of expert and system and then calculated the agreement measure and association measure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria are usually interpreted by some statistical measurement which is belonging to quantitative evaluation methods. Based on [3], statistical measures are separated into three classes: pair measurement, group measurement and agreement ratios, so the validation criteria will be explained in such way too Pair measurement is done by constructed the contingency table of all possible pair of expert and system and then calculated the agreement measure and association measure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors were diagnosed during the testing process and corrected while the software was still under construction and before transforming it into an executable version. The developer performed integration testing to verify that all units operate together as expected [39]. To run the system, the user shall provide the required inputs.…”
Section: End Submentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation is performed to ensure that the softwareworks accurately [39] andgives correct results to obtain the objectives. The satisfaction of the four professionalsin Table 2 can be considered as an evidence for the software's validation as they are satisfied with the input-output system, software speed, help facilities, and other components.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verification and validation are the most important and difficult tasks involved in intelligent system development (Aguilar et al 2008). Verification can be performed through testing activities to verify that the correct system is being built.…”
Section: System Verification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unit testing means testing the units one by one by separate testing activities (Aguilar et al 2008). This testing was performed continually during all of the stages of development of ES-CCPRHP to verify that each unit in the system performs the intended function.…”
Section: Unit and Integration Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%