2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10617-016-9173-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of fixed-point digital controllers using direct and delta forms realizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to tackle such problem, this paper proposes a verification methodology based on bounded model checking (BMC) techniques [11], which verifies properties on statespace digital controllers, by means of a verification tool named as Digital-Systems Verifier (DSVerifier). It is worth noting that this paper extends a previous work [7,18,2,13,6]. In particular, the major improvement of the DSVerifier version described here relies on the support for state-space models, which allows a better insight about the internal system behavior, enables the verification of new properties (e.g., controllability and observability), and considers initial conditions for system analysis [14].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to tackle such problem, this paper proposes a verification methodology based on bounded model checking (BMC) techniques [11], which verifies properties on statespace digital controllers, by means of a verification tool named as Digital-Systems Verifier (DSVerifier). It is worth noting that this paper extends a previous work [7,18,2,13,6]. In particular, the major improvement of the DSVerifier version described here relies on the support for state-space models, which allows a better insight about the internal system behavior, enables the verification of new properties (e.g., controllability and observability), and considers initial conditions for system analysis [14].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, Alur et al [3,4] proposed the prior automated verification approaches, regarding model checking, which inspired the development of other verifiers for cyber-physical systems and hybrid automata (e.g., Maellan [32], Open-Kronos [33], and UPPAAL [5]). Nonetheless, differently from the work presented here, such approaches do not tackle system robustness related to implementation aspects [7,18,2].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, digital filters and controllers [31,43,44] were tackled, in order to specify system-level properties of those systems, using linear-time temporal logic [45]. In particular, a specific UAV application was tackled, with the goal to verify its attitude controllers [46]. In general, however, there is still a lack of studies to verify systemlevel properties related to embedded systems; emphasis should be given to micro-grids [2] and cyber-physical systems [4], which require high-dependability requirements for computation, control, and communication.…”
Section: Current Achievements and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardware choice, structure representations (e.g., direct forms), and implementation features (e.g., number of integer and fractional bits, in fixed-point arithmetic) can heavily influence a given digital-system's precision and performance [2]. Additionally, such implementations are particularly susceptible to finite word-length (FWL) effects (e.g., overflows, limit cycles, and poles and zeros sensitivity), which have the potential to reduce the associated reliability and efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%